![]() |
JOURNAL TOOLS |
Opzioni di pubblicazione |
eTOC |
Per abbonarsi PROMO |
Sottometti un articolo |
Segnala alla tua biblioteca |
ARTICLE TOOLS |
Estratti |
Permessi |
Share |


I TUOI DATI
I TUOI ORDINI
CESTINO ACQUISTI
N. prodotti: 0
Totale ordine: € 0,00
COME ORDINARE
I TUOI ABBONAMENTI
I TUOI ARTICOLI
I TUOI EBOOK
COUPON
ACCESSIBILITÀ
ORIGINAL ARTICLES UPDATE ON CAROTID ARTERY STENTING
The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2009 December;50(6):789-93
Copyright © 2009 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA
lingua: Inglese
Advancements in the Mo.Ma system procedure during carotid artery stenting
Coppi G., Moratto R., Silingardi R., Veronesi J., Nicolosi E., Chester J. ✉
Department of Vascular Surgery, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinic of Modena Nuovo Ospedale S. Agostino Estense, Modena, Italy
AIM: The aim of this paper was to reduce the incidence of clamping intolerance, asystolia, immediate mortality and neurological complications associated with carotid artery stenting (CAS) using the Mo.Ma system (Invatec, Roncadelle Brescia, Italy) embolic protection device (EPD).
METHODS: CAS was perfomed using the Mo.Ma system in 312 patients between January 2002-October 2009. From October 2008 variations to the standard technique were introduced. A total of 214 patients were treated with the standard technique, and 88 with the new technique. Improvements include the engagement of the guidewire's floppy tip through the lesion whilst the cerebral blood flow is maintained, a slow release post-dilation (1 atm/2 s), a quicker manual aspiration procedure following post-dilation, a redirection of blood flow into the external carotid artery (ECA) with the post-dilation balloon inflated in the internal carotid artery (ICA), and a further manual aspiration and the subsequent release of the Mo.Ma system.
RESULTS: This study reports reduced incidence of clamping intolerance (7.9% vs. 4.5%), asystolia (0 vs. 1.9%), immediate mortality (0 vs. 0.9%) and neurological complications (1.1% vs. 3.7%). The only neurological complication associated with the new technique was a transient ischemic attack (TIA).
CONCLUSIONS: The new variations of the standard Mo.Ma technique seem rational in the improvement of the safety and efficacy of CAS using an EPD, in reducing the incidence of clamping intolerance and asystolia, immediate mortality and neurological complications. This series indicates a positive trend for this revised technique, but a multicentre registry is required to validate these promising results.