Home > Riviste > Italian Journal of Dermatology and Venereology > Fascicoli precedenti > Italian Journal of Dermatology and Venereology 2021 April;156(2) > Italian Journal of Dermatology and Venereology 2021 April;156(2):142-6

ULTIMO FASCICOLO
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
Per abbonarsi
Sottometti un articolo
Segnala alla tua biblioteca
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Estratti
Permessi
Per citare questo articolo
Share

 

REVIEW  PEMPHIGUS Freefree

Italian Journal of Dermatology and Venereology 2021 April;156(2):142-6

DOI: 10.23736/S2784-8671.21.06810-3

Copyright © 2021 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

lingua: Inglese

Clinicians’ pearls and myths in pemphigus

Hazem A. JURATLI 1 , Pinar AVCI 1, Barbara HORVÁTH 2

1 Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany; 2 Department of Dermatology, Center for Blistering Diseases, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands



Pemphigus comprises a heterogeneous group of autoimmune blistering diseases, which can affect both skin and mucous membranes, especially oral mucosa. This group of diseases shows usually a chronic-relapsing course. Since pemphigus is a rare disease, the diagnosis is often delayed, because it is based upon the recognition of consistent clinical, histologic, and direct immunofluorescence findings, as well as indirect immunofluorescence, and/or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Usually the patients are treated for multiple other conditions before starting the correct therapy, leading to a critical reduction of the patients’ quality of life. This review is a succinct compilation of pearls gathered from clinical experience in pemphigus and the myths that may have influenced everyday practice but have been proven false. This review provided a selection of such dilemmas and controversies, focusing on myths and pearls that can help young dermatologist in the clinic, while also dispelling them.


KEY WORDS: Pemphigus, Review; Dermatology

inizio pagina