Home > Riviste > Italian Journal of Dermatology and Venereology > Fascicoli precedenti > Giornale Italiano di Dermatologia e Venereologia 2016 October;151(5) > Giornale Italiano di Dermatologia e Venereologia 2016 October;151(5):507-14

ULTIMO FASCICOLO
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Opzioni di pubblicazione
eTOC
Per abbonarsi
Sottometti un articolo
Segnala alla tua biblioteca
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Estratti
Permessi
Per citare questo articolo
Share

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLES   

Giornale Italiano di Dermatologia e Venereologia 2016 October;151(5):507-14

Copyright © 2016 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

lingua: Inglese

Clinical and instrumental evaluation of a cross-linked hyaluronic acid filler dermal injection: effects on nasolabial folds skin biophysical parameters and augmentation from a single-dose, monocentric, open-label trial

Norma CAMELI, Maria MARIANO, Mirko SERIO, Enzo BERARDESCA

Department of Dermatology, San Gallicano Institute IRCCS, Rome, Italy


PDF


BACKGROUND: When a hyaluronic acid dermal device to fill soft tissues is chosen, efficacy, safety and durability are key concerns. This is an open-label prospective study to instrumentally evaluate the effects of HA filler dermal injection on nasolabial folds skin biophysical parameters and augmentation.
METHODS: A single Italian site treated female subjects aged 40-55, for nasolabial folds, with a single standardized injection. The outcome was evaluated with objective quantitative measurements after 90 (T1) and 180 days (T2) from the injection comparing to baseline (T0) by means of Corneometer (skin hydration measurement), Cutometer (skin elasticity measurement), and Visioface devices for digital and UV computerized image analysis. Secondary endpoints were safety assessment, subject investigator satisfaction with the intervention. Assessment of aesthetic results included photographic documentation.
RESULTS: The computerized image analysis confirmed the clinical assessment showing statistically significant reduction in nasolabial folds both at T1 and T2. Visioface® indexes showed a marked and statistical significant response. An excellent profile of satisfaction of the product at T2 from investigators and patients was recorded. Skin hydration and elasticity did not show significant changes.
CONCLUSIONS: In our study, a standardized HA filler dermal injection on nasolabial folds did not influence skin biophysical parameters such as skin hydration and elasticity. Nasolabial folds showed a persistent and significative response at T2 confirmed by instrumental evaluation. The tolerability and safety profile of the product was excellent.

inizio pagina