Home > Riviste > Italian Journal of Dermatology and Venereology > Fascicoli precedenti > Giornale Italiano di Dermatologia e Venereologia 2016 October;151(5) > Giornale Italiano di Dermatologia e Venereologia 2016 October;151(5):485-91

ULTIMO FASCICOLO
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Opzioni di pubblicazione
eTOC
Per abbonarsi
Sottometti un articolo
Segnala alla tua biblioteca
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Estratti
Permessi
Per citare questo articolo
Share

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLES   

Giornale Italiano di Dermatologia e Venereologia 2016 October;151(5):485-91

Copyright © 2016 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

lingua: Inglese

Efficacy of propranolol for cutaneous hemangiomas in premature children

Valeria BRAZZELLI 1, Chiara GIORGINI 1, Stefania BARRUSCOTTI 1, Claudia A. CODAZZI 2, Savina MANNARINO 2, Chryssoula TZIALLA 3, Mauro STRONATI 3, Gian L. MARSEGLIA 2, Giovanni BORRONI 1

1 Institute of Dermatology, Department of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, San Matteo Polyclinic and Scientific Research Foundation, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; 2 Department of Pediatrics, San Matteo Polyclinic and Scientific Research Foundation, Pavia, Italy; 3 Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, San Matteo Polyclinic and Scientific Research Foundation, Pavia, Italy


PDF


BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of propranolol for problematic infantile hemangiomas (IH), showing our experience on 24 children, with special focus on premature infants.
METHODS: A retrospective observational study considered 24 patients who were given oral propranolol for the treatment of “problematic” IH. A multidisciplinary team, composed of a dermatologist, a pediatrician, a pediatric cardiologist, and a neonatologist, took part in the indication for propranolol and follow-up on all the patients. Propranolol was administered orally at the starting dose of 0.5-1 mg/kg/die and was gradually increased to the target dose of 2 mg/kg/die. A clinical gravity score, based on color, major diameter, thickness and texture was calculated for each IH, giving a numeric score before (t0) and after (tf) propranolol therapy. Improvement rate was evaluated in terms of score percentage difference between t0 and tf.
RESULTS: All of the IH except one (96%), showed a variable grade of improvement, with a median score improvement of 69.1%. Median initial score in premature and term infants did not show any significant difference (P=0.38). Otherwise the two subgroups showed a significant difference in final scores: medium percentage improvement in premature and term infants, was respectively 80.9% and 49.6% (P<0.01). No significant side effects were reported during the treatment period.
CONCLUSIONS: As pointed out in our study, IH in premature children showed a significantly better response to propranolol treatment.

inizio pagina