Home > Journals > Italian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery > Past Issues > Italian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2015 September;22(3) > Italian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2015 September;22(3):141-5

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Publishing options
eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as
Share

 

REVIEWS   

Italian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2015 September;22(3):141-5

Copyright © 2015 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Treatment of acute aortic type B dissection

Gombert A. 1, Thilo Von Trotha K. 1, Jacobs M. J. 1, 2, Grommes J. 1, 3

1 European Vascular Center Aachen-Maastricht, University Hospital RWTH, Aachen, Germany; 2 European Vascular Center Aachen-Maastricht, Medical University Maastricht, The Netherlands; 3 Institute for Cardiovascular Prevention, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany


PDF


Acute dissection is still a life-threatening disease. In contrast to Stanford type A aortic dissection, which needs urgent surgical repair, the majority of type B aortic dissection can be successfully treated with effective antihypertensive therapy in the acute phase. However, one- third of patients with type B aortic dissection suffer life-threatening complications, including death, rupture, increasing aortic diameter, and visceral or lower limb ischemia both in the acute and in the long-term phase. Thoracic endovascular therapy (TEVAR) has become the standard therapy in case of acute complicated type B dissection. Open surgical repair in the acute setting is only indicated in selected situations. The medical treatment remains the standard therapy for uncomplicated cases although this therapy does not prevent long-term complications like post dissection aneurysm. Little evidence derived from small prospective randomized trials support that prophylactic TEVAR in uncomplicated type B dissections might improve survival after type B dissection and reduce the risk of aneurysmatic enlargement. Therefore, there is a shift to treat more patients by endovascular means in the acute setting.

top of page