Home > Journals > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness > Past Issues > Articles online first > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2021 Feb 23

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as
Share

 

 

The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2021 Feb 23

DOI: 10.23736/S0022-4707.21.12196-6

Copyright © 2021 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Consequences of police-related personal protective equipment and physical training status on thermoregulation and exercise energy expenditure

Lukas ZWINGMANN 1, 2 , Tim BELOW 2, Hans BRAUN 2, 3, Patrick WAHL 1, 2, Jan-Peter GOLDMANN 2, 4

1 Department of Molecular and Cellular Sport Medicine, Institute of Cardiology and Sports Medicine, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany; 2 The German Research Centre of Elite Sport Cologne, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany; 3 Institute of Biochemistry German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany; 4 Institute of Biomechanics and Orthopaedics, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany;


PDF


BACKGROUND: The aim was to examine the impact of personal protective equipment (PPE) on human thermoregulation and its alteration in groups of different training status.
METHODS: 45 men performed a maximum voluntary contraction test in an upright pull position to determine lower body strength and a graded treadmill test to determine maximum oxygen uptake (VO2max). Body composition was estimated via bioelectric impedance analysis. According to specific cutoff values, participants were assigned to a group of endurance-trained, strength-trained, endurance- and strength-trained, or untrained individuals. Subsequently, they completed two graded exercise tests until volitional exhaustion, once wearing sports wear (SPW) and once wearing PPE (20.9 kg). Participants were weighed before and afterward to investigate sweat loss and sweat rate. Body temperature was measured continuously from the tympanic membrane. Energy expenditure was derived from breathing gas analysis.
RESULTS: Sweat rate was 91% higher in PPE than in SPW but not significantly differnt between groups (p > 0.05). Body temperature was significantly higher in PPE during submaximal (+1.14 ± 0.45 °C) and maximal exercise intensity (+0.68 ± 0.57 °C) and was poorely related to VO2max and body composition. Energy expenditure significantly differed between both garments (+37% in PPE) and groups (p < 0.05). Additionally, energy expenditure significantly correlated with body weight (r = 0.84 in SPW and r = 0.68 in PPE).
CONCLUSIONS: Strength training alone does not seem to have any or negligible effects on thermoregulation. Endurance training and weight management might lead to rather small improvements in heat tolerance.


KEY WORDS: Body armor; Load carriage; Heat stress; Sweat loss; Body temperature

top of page