Home > Journals > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness > Past Issues > Articles online first > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2018 Jan 04

CURRENT ISSUE
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Cite this article as

THE JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE AND PHYSICAL FITNESS

A Journal on Applied Physiology, Biomechanics, Preventive Medicine,
Sports Medicine and Traumatology, Sports Psychology


Indexed/Abstracted in: Chemical Abstracts, CINAHL, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 1,215


eTOC

 

The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2018 Jan 04

DOI: 10.23736/S0022-4707.18.08105-7

Copyright © 2018 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Test-retest reliability and criterion validity of a new Taekwondo anaerobic intermittent kick test

Amel TAYECH 1, 2, Mohamed A. MEJRI 1, 2, Helmi CHAABENE 1, Mehdi CHAOUACHI 1, 3, David G. BEHM 4, Anis CHAOUACHI 1, 5

1 Tunisian Research Laboratory ''Sports Performance Optimization'', National Center of Medicine and Science in Sports (CNMSS), Tunis, Tunisia; 2 High Institute of Sport and Physical Education, Ksar-Saïd, Manouba University, Tunis, Tunisia; 3 Movement Sport and Health Sciences Laboratory, University of Rennes 2-ENS Cachan, Rennes, France; 4 School of Human Kinetics and Recreation, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada; 5 AUT University, Sports Performance Research Institute New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand


PDF  


BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the relative and absolute test-retest reliability and criterion validity of a new Taekwondo anaerobic intermittent kick test (TAIKT).
METHODS: Twenty Tunisian elite Taekwondo athletes participated in this study (15 males and 5 females). Participants performed the TAIKT and the Running-based Anaerobic Sprint Test (RAST), twice (test and retest), on separate occasions three-week apart. Peak heart rate (HRpeak), blood lactate concentration [La־], and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were measured during each session.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the test and retest of TAIKT and RAST for all performances and physiological variables, except for the absolute mean power (Pmean) of RAST. Test-retest results showed that the TAIKT and RAST were reliable. All TAIKT and RAST parameters had an ICC>0.90, SEM<5%, with the smallest worthwhile change slightly higher than SEM, with very small limits of concordance. Strong significant correlations were found between TAIKT and RAST parameters (Ppeak (r=0.81; r=0.70), Pmean (r=0.72; r=0.60) in (W and W·Kg-67 respectively), fatigue index (r=0.81), [La־] (r=0.89) and RPE (r=0.78) at P<0.01, and HRpeak (r=0.55, at P<0.05)).
CONCLUSIONS: The findings showed that the TAIKT can be considered as a valid and reliable specific test for assessing anaerobic power of Taekwondo athletes.


KEY WORDS: Glycolytic system - Running-Based Anaerobic Sprint Test - Martial arts - Performance, Validity

top of page

Publication History

Article first published online: January 4, 2018
Manuscript accepted: January 3, 2018
Manuscript revised: December 5, 2017
Manuscript received: August 29, 2017

Cite this article as

Tayech A, Mejri MA, Chaabene H, Chaouachi M, Behm DG, Chaouachi A. Test-retest reliability and criterion validity of a new Taekwondo anaerobic intermittent kick test. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2018 Jan 04. DOI: 10.23736/S0022-4707.18.08105-7

Corresponding author e-mail

anis.chaouachi@email.ati.tn