Home > Journals > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness > Past Issues > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2022 April;62(4) > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2022 April;62(4):467-75

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Publishing options
eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as
Share

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE  EXERCISE PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOMECHANICS 

The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2022 April;62(4):467-75

DOI: 10.23736/S0022-4707.21.12859-2

Copyright © 2021 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Sprint mechanical properties of professional rugby league players according to playing standard, age and position, and the association with key physical characteristics

Nick DOBBIN

Department of Health Professions, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK



BACKGROUND: This study determined the influence of playing standard, age, and position on the horizontal force-velocity (FV) properties of rugby league players, and the association with other physical characteristics.
METHODS: This observational study used a cross-sectional study design with a range of physical characteristics recorded from 132 players from 5 Super League clubs. Sprint data was used to derived theoretical maximal force (F0) and velocity (V0), power (Pmax), maximal rate of force (RFmax) and the rate of decrease in RFmax (DRF). Differences between playing standard, age groups and playing positions were determined (P value and standardized mean difference [SMD]) along with correlational analysis to assess the relationship between FV properties and key physical characteristics.
RESULTS: Senior players reported lower split times (SMD=-0.26-0.59, P=0.002-0.017), and higher absolute F0, Pmax and V0 (SMD=0.47-0.78, P<0.001-0.010). Players aged <21 years reported higher split times and lower absolute F0 compared to 21-26 years (SMD=-0.84-0.56, P<0.001-0.04) and a lower V0 than >26 years (SMD=-0.40, P=0.002). Hit-up forwards were slower than outside backs (SMD=-0.30-0.89, P<0.001-0.042), though produced the highest absolute F0 and Pmax. Sprit times, F0, V0, Pmax and RFmax were associated with change of direction and countermovement jump performance, whilst FVslope and DRF were associated with countermovement jump performance only. F0 and Pmax were associated with medicine ball throw distance (r=0.302-0371, P≤0.001). There was no association with prone Yo-Yo IR1 distance (r=-0.16-0.09, P=0.060-0.615).
CONCLUSIONS: These results provide insight into the horizontal FV properties with reference to key subgroups and highlights several associations with other characteristics across large sample of rugby league players. The result of this study should be used when interpreting the sprint ability of rugby league players, planning the long-term development of youth players, and inform program design for all.


KEY WORDS: Mechanics; Sports; Team sports

top of page