Home > Journals > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness > Past Issues > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2022 January;62(1) > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2022 January;62(1):25-38

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as
Share

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE  EXERCISE PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOMECHANICS 

The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2022 January;62(1):25-38

DOI: 10.23736/S0022-4707.21.12086-9

Copyright © 2021 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Effect of three fitness programs on strength, speed, flexibility and muscle power on sedentary subjects

Habil HAMDOUNI 1, 2 , Brian KLISZCZEWICZ 3, Hassane ZOUHAL 4, Fatma RHIBI 5, Fatma Z. BEN SALAH 1, Abderraouf BEN ABDERRAHMAN 2

1 Department of Medicine Physical and Functional Rehabilitation, M.T. Kassab National Institute of Orthopedics, Tunis, Tunisia; 2 Higher Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Ksar-Said, Manouba University, Manouba, Tunisia; 3 Department of Exercise Science and Sport Management, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA, USA; 4 Movement, Sport, Health and Sciences Laboratory (M2S), UFR/APS, University of Rennes 2 - École Normale Supérieure de Cachan, Rennes, France; 5 Hypoxia and Pathophysiology of Cardiovascular and Respiratory (Hp2) Laboratory, INSERM U1042, University of Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France



BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to research and compare the effect of Crossfit® (CF), LesMills® (LM) and traditional resistance (TRAD) training program on short performances.
METHODS: Participants were assigned randomly into three groups and followed the training sessions allocated at the rate of five sessions/week for 16 weeks. A battery of tests including anthropometric and performance measures were carried out over three sessions: before training (T0), after eight weeks (T1) and sixteen weeks of training (T2).
RESULTS: Findings indicated that strength tests demonstrated a significant time effect (P<0.001, ηp2=0.6), the results showed that CF and TRAD groups improved strength every 8 weeks while LM group only at T2, The speed test demonstrated also a significant time effect (P<0.001, ηp2=0.5) the results showed an improvement in speed every 8 weeks for LM, at T2 for CF and no change for TRAD, for flexibility, all tests demonstrated a main time effect (P<0.001, ηp2. 0.46-0.7) CF was the best in shoulder range of motion and LM in trunk and lower limb flexibility, all power tests also demonstrated a significant time effect (P<0.001, ηp2: 0.76-0.9) the improvement for all groups was every 8 weeks.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on these findings, we recommend TRAD and CF as valuable trainings for strength development, LM for flexibility and all three trainings for power improvement.


KEY WORDS: Physical fitness; Exercise; Athletic performance

top of page