Home > Journals > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness > Past Issues > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2019 November;59(11) > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2019 November;59(11):1828-34

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Publishing options
eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as
Share

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE  EXERCISE PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOMECHANICS 

The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2019 November;59(11):1828-34

DOI: 10.23736/S0022-4707.19.09463-5

Copyright © 2019 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Assessment of muscle fiber adaptation in footballers using a new ELISA assay of myosin isoforms

Mario GUERRERO 1, Gerard CARMONA 2, Gil RODAS 3, Joan A. CADEFAU 1, 2, Antonio MAESTRO 4, Roser CUSSÓ 1, 5

1 Department of Biomedecine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; 2 INEF of Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain; 3 Futbol Club Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; 4 Real Sporting Club Gijón, Gijón, Spain; 5 Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain



BACKGROUND: To measure the impact of training models on injury incidence, data of health and performance were integrated to study fiber adaptation during a competitive season. We studied football players over a season, analyzing hours of exposure to sport by serum changes in fast and slow myosin, creatine kinase and lactate dehydrogenase.
METHODS: A new assay was developed to measure the myosin isoforms in 49 non-sporting volunteers and in 27 professional football players.
RESULTS: Myosin isoforms in volunteers with mean ages of 30±8 were 1553 µg/L fast and 1284 µg/L slow; in the group with of 56±7 were 1426 µg/L fast and 1046 µg/L slow. Slow myosin was significantly lower in older subjects (-18%). Samples from the players in preseason had lower mean scores for fast myosin (1123 µg/L) and higher for slow myosin (2072 µg/L) than reference volunteers. During the season, myosins reached the maximum with the maximum load (1537 µg/L fast, 2195 µg/L slow but decreased and adapted to the high level of demand (425 µg/L fast, 1342 µg/L slow). CK and LDH were maximal at the pre-season (227 U/L, 333 U/L) while myosin levels were maximal at the beginning of season (1537 µg/L, 2195 µg/L).
CONCLUSIONS: Measuring serum myosin isoforms we identify the type and amount of damage caused by training and matches, making it a new control tool capable of advising training towards a minimum of blood slow myosin but controlling the fast fiber participating and be able to improve the performance of the players.


KEY WORDS: Myosins; Football; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay

top of page