Home > Journals > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness > Past Issues > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2018 March;58(3) > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2018 March;58(3):263-70

CURRENT ISSUE
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Cite this article as

THE JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE AND PHYSICAL FITNESS

A Journal on Applied Physiology, Biomechanics, Preventive Medicine,
Sports Medicine and Traumatology, Sports Psychology


Indexed/Abstracted in: Chemical Abstracts, CINAHL, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 1,215


eTOC

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE  BODY COMPOSITION, NUTRITION AND SUPPLEMENTATION


The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2018 March;58(3):263-70

DOI: 10.23736/S0022-4707.16.06698-6

Copyright © 2016 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Strength, body composition, and functional outcomes in the squat versus leg press exercises

Fabrício E. ROSSI 1, 2, Brad J. SCHOENFELD 3, Skyler OCETNIK 1, Jonathan YOUNG 1, Andrew VIGOTSKY 4, Bret CONTRERAS 5, James W. KRIEGER 6, Michael G. MILLER 7, Jason CHOLEWA 2

1 Institute of Bioscience, Department of Physical Education, São Paulo State University, Rio Claro, Brazil; 2 Department of Kinesiology, Coastal Carolina University, Conway, SC, USA; 3 Department of Health Sciences, CUNY Lehman College, Bronx, NY, USA; 4 Kinesiology Program, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA; 5 Sport Performance Research Institute, AUT University, Auckland, New Zealand; 6 Weightology, LLC, Issaquah, WA, USA; 7 Department of Human Performance and Health Education, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, USA


PDF  


BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare strength, body composition, and functional outcome measures following performance of the back squat, leg press, or a combination of the two exercises.
METHODS: Subjects were pair-matched based on initial strength levels and then randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: a squat-only group (SQ) that solely performed squats for the lower body; a leg press-only group (LP) that solely performed leg presses for the lower body, or a combined squat and leg press group (SQ-LP) that performed both squats and leg presses for the lower body. All other RT variables were held constant. The study period lasted 10 weeks with subjects performing 2 lower body workouts per week comprising 6 sets per session at loads corresponding to 8-12 RM with 90- to 120-second rest intervals.
RESULTS: Results showed that SQ had greater transfer to maximal squat strength compared to the leg press. Effect sizes favored SQ and SQ-LP versus LP with respect to countermovement jump while greater effect sizes for dynamic balance were noted for SQ-LP and LP compared to SQ, although no statistical differences were noted between conditions.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that both free weights and machines can improve functional outcomes, and that the extent of transfer may be specific to the given task.


KEY WORDS: Physical fitness - Resistance training - Exercise

top of page

Publication History

Issue published online: February 9, 2018
Article first published online: October 13, 2016
Manuscript accepted: October 12, 2016
Manuscript revised: September 23, 2016
Manuscript received: May 13, 2016

Cite this article as

Rossi FE, Schoenfeld BJ, Ocetnik S, Young J, Vigotsky A, Contreras B, et al. Strength, body composition, and functional outcomes in the squat versus leg press exercises. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2018;58:263-70. DOI: 10.23736/S0022-4707.16.06698-6

Corresponding author e-mail

jcholewa@coastal.edu