Home > Journals > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness > Past Issues > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2017 June;57(6) > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2017 June;57(6):725-33

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE  EXERCISE PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOMECHANICS 

The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2017 June;57(6):725-33

DOI: 10.23736/S0022-4707.16.06363-5

Copyright © 2016 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Co-contraction training, muscle explosive force and associated electromyography activity

Sana ZBIDI 1, Badrane ZINOUBI 1, Omar HAMMOUDA 1, Henry VANDEWALLE 2, Virgile SERRAU 1, Tarak DRISS 1

1 Laboratoire CeRSM (EA 2931), Equipe de Physiologie, Biomécanique et Imagerie du Mouvement, UFR STAPS, Université Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense, Nanterre, France; 2 Laboratoire de Physiologie, UFR de Santé, Médecine et Biologie Humaine, Université Paris XIII, Bobigny, France


PDF


BACKGROUND: The effects of a six-week Maximal isometric voluntary co-contraction (MIVCC) training program of the elbow flexor and extensor muscles on maximal and explosive muscle strength have been studied.
METHODS: Ten active men underwent 6-week MIVCC. Maximal rate of force development (MRFD) of the elbow flexor (MRFDflex) and extensor (MRFDext) were measured in addition to maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) of these muscles (MVCflex and MVCext) before (T0), after 4-week (T1) and 6-week (T2) MIVCC training program. During each test session, integrated electromyographic activity (iEMG) of agonistic and antagonistic muscles during MVC, MRFD, submaximal contractions (30% and 60% MVC) and MIVCC of the elbow flexor and extensor muscles were measured.
RESULTS: At T2, MVCflex (13.3±11.7%) and MVCext (22.5±6.1%) increased significantly (P<0.001). Similarly, iEMG of agonists muscles during MVC increased significantly for flexor (+29.9%) and extensor (+29.6%) muscles (P<0.001) without changes of antagonists co-activation. The increases in MRFDflex (+12.5%), MRFDext (+9.2%) and iEMG at MRFD were not significant.
CONCLUSIONS: MIVCC training can simultaneously improve strength of antagonistic muscles without inducing an alteration of MRFD or an increase in muscles co-activation during contractions of the agonist muscles. Interestingly, the improvement of estimated forces during MIVCC after 6-week-training suggested that the higher level of MIVCC previously observed in bodybuilders could be the result of specific training exercises (posing). The fact that MIVCC training did not alter “explosive” force production, which is important in optimal design of sports-specific resistance training as well as in rehabilitation programs.


KEY WORDS: Resistance training - Isometric contraction - Electromyography

top of page