Home > Journals > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness > Past Issues > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2016 December;56(12) > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2016 December;56(12):1562-73

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as

 

REVIEW  EPIDEMIOLOGY AND CLINICAL MEDICINE 

The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2016 December;56(12):1562-73

Copyright © 2016 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Sickle cell trait: what are the costs and benefits of screening?

Roy J. SHEPHARD

Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada


PDF


INTRODUCTION: Eight percent of African Americans are carriers of the sickle cell trait. Some regard this as a benign anomaly, but others point to incidents of sudden exercise-related death, calling for a preliminary screening of either all athletes or those of African-American ancestry. This brief review considers the costs and benefits of such screening.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: The Ovid/Health Star data-base was searched from 1996 to June 2015. 2014. The terms “exercise”, “exercise therapy”, “sports”, “athletes”, “physical activity/motor activity” and “physical fitness” were combined to yield 227,120 citations. Likewise, the terms “sickle cell trait”, “sickle cell disease”, “splenic infarction”, “hemoglobin S” and “rhabdomyolysis” identified 12,325 citations. A combination of the 2 searches yielded 416 abstracts.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Excluding items relating to animal research or forms of rhabdomyolysis other than sickling left 375 abstracts; 115 papers merited full examination. This material covered the risks of sickle cell trait and of screening (55 items), effects upon physical performance (31 items), cellular mechanisms (23 items), nutrition (4 items), and other topics (2 items). Supplemented material was drawn from reference lists and personal files. The tendency to sickling was provoked by excessive exercise relative to physical condition in hot or hypoxic conditions, and by local tissue acidosis, conditions that were best avoided by all athletes. The condition had little impact upon physical performance, but the relative risks of heat illness, exertional rhabdomyolysis, splenic infarction and sudden death were all increased by the sickle cell trait. The absolute number of critical incidents was nevertheless small, calling for close assessment of the costs and putative benefits of widespread screening.
CONCLUSIONS: Sports physicians should be aware of the clinical picture of sickling and be prepared to treat it. Screening may be cost-effective if targeted to black athletes involved in certain sports, although it has yet to be demonstrated how far the diagnosis of sickle cell trait reduces the risk of death when exercising in an adverse environment. A better tactic may be to reduce risks for all competitors by educating athletes and their coaches to adopt an intensity of training appropriate to the individual’s physical condition, to maintain full hydration, and to avoid exposure to excessive heat and hypoxia.


KEY WORDS: Cost-benefit analysis - Rhabdomyolysis - Hemoglobin, sickle - Splenic infarction - Death, sudden

top of page