Home > Journals > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness > Past Issues > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2013 December;53(6) > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2013 December;53(6):693-700

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Publishing options
eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints
Permissions
Share

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLES  EPIDEMIOLOGY AND CLINICAL MEDICINE 

The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2013 December;53(6):693-700

Copyright © 2013 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Assessment of power, speed, and agility in athletic, preadolescent youth

Jones M. T. 1, Lorenzo D. C. 2

1 Sports Medicine Assessment, Research and Testing (SMART) Laboratory, Division of Health and Human Performance George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA; 2 Department of Physical Education and Health Education, Springfield College Springfield, MA, USA


PDF


Aim: The aim of this report was to assess power, speed, and agility in athletic, preadolescent youth, and determine how agility related to muscular strength and power.
Methods: Boys (N.=53) and girls (N.=104) completed vertical jump (VJ), standing long jump (SLJ), seated medicine ball throw (SMBT), proagility shuttle run (PRO), partial curl-ups (CURL), and 20 yd sprint (20 SP). One-way analysis of variance for gender comparison and multiple regression analysis for determining association among tests were used.
Results: No gender differences (P>0.05) existed for VJ or PRO. However, boys performed better on SLJ (P=0.03; 162.61+24.64 vs.154.51+20.78 cm), 20 SP (P=0.001; 3.70+0.35 vs. 3.96+0.33 s), and CURL (P=0.02; 35.16+9.67 vs. 31.48+8.80) while girls scored higher on SMBT (P=0.001; 340.46+68.58 vs. 287.12+56.39 cm). Among girls, PRO was correlated (P<0.01) with SLJ (r=-0.70) and VJ (r=-0.67). In boys, correlations (P<0.01) existed between VJ and SLJ (r=0.73) and 20 SP and PRO (r=0.72).
Conclusion: The current study supports previous research that found a correlation between SLJ and VJ. SLJ, VJ and SP were significant predictors of PRO, accounting for 55%, 46%, and 43% of the variation, respectively. The PRO agility test is easy to administer and requires lower body strength and power necessary for the quick changes in direction inherent to ground-based field sports. When designing a performance-related test battery for young athletes, PRO, SLJ, and VJ are effective measures and worthy of inclusion.

top of page