Home > Journals > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness > Past Issues > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2009 December;49(4) > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2009 December;49(4):464-73

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Publishing options
eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints
Permissions
Share

 

Original articles  OTHER AREAS
(Biochemistry, Immunology, Kinanthropometry, Neurology, Neurophysiology, Ophtalmology, Pharmacology, Phlebology, etc.)
 

The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2009 December;49(4):464-73

Copyright © 2010 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Bone Mineral Density and Content of Collegiate Throwers: Influence of Maximum Strength

Whittington J. 1, Schoen E. 1, Labounty L. L. 1, Hamdy R. 1, Ramsey M. W. 1, Stone M. E. 1, Sands W. A. 2, Haff G. G. 3, Stone M. H. 1

1 Sports Performance Enhancement Consortium, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA; 2 Performance Services- Sports Science, United States Olympic Committee, Colorado Springs, CO, USA; 3 Division of Exercise Physiology, West Virginia Unversity School of Medicine, Morganton, wv, USA


PDF


AIM: Bone changes in size and density in response to different levels of stress. Alterations to bone mineral density (BMD) appear to occur in a site specific manner. Even though BMD has been examined in many populations there is a paucity of data looking at strength-power athletes, such as throwers. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the BMD of a group of USA Division I collegiate throwers (e.g. shot put, discus, etc.).
METHODS: Seven throwers (4 males; 3 females) who were 19.0 ± 0.9 years had their BMD compared to an age matched control group (n=14; 8 women and 6 men) and normative data. BMD was measured with dual X-ray absorptometry. Potential right/left side and sex difference in BMD were also examined. Maximal isometric strength was assessed using a mid-thigh pull while standing on a forceplate which generated force-time curves. Peak force (PF) and normalized peak force (PFa) were then correlated with BMDs.
RESULTS: Generally, throwers had denser bones with male throwers tending to have a greater total BMD (P≤0.05). The dominant arm BMD was slightly greater when compared to non-dominant arm (P≤0.05). Furthermore, total body BMD was related to PF (r=0.68, r2 =0.46) and PFa (r=0.56, r2=0.31).
CONCLUSIONS: Throwers have greater BMDs than non-athletes and most other athletes. However, throwers only showed a small indication of sidedness. It is likely that the BMDs observed in this study stem from the training intervention (e.g. whole body heavy lifting) undertaken by this population.

top of page