Home > Journals > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness > Past Issues > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2009 June;49(2) > Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2009 June;49(2):136-41

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints

 

Original articles  EXERCISE PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOMECHANICS 

Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2009 June;49(2):136-41

Copyright © 2009 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Relationship between physical activity and aerobic fitness

Nokes N.

College of Health and Human Performance Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA


PDF


Aim. Physical activity (PA) and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) are indicators of cardiovascular disease risk and all-cause mortality. Many health advocates use PA and CRF interchangeably. However, quantification of the relationship between objectively measured PA and CRF is rarely found.
Methods. The association between objectively measured PA volume (PAv), intensity (PAi), and CRF indexed by V.O2max was assessed in a cross-sectional study; 275 women (40.1±3.0 years) wore accelerometers at the hip for seven days. They performed a graded maximal treadmill test to measure CRF and had their percent body fat (%BF) assessed.
Results. PAv (F=12.33, P<0.0001) and PAi (F=48.5, P<0.0001) were both significant predictors of CRF, together accounting for 26.9% of the variance (P<0.0001). However, with PAi controlled, PAv was not related to CRF. Yet, with PAv controlled, PAi remained a strong predictor. %BF explained 47% (P<0.0001) of the variance in CRF.
Conclusion. CRF is more a function of PAi than PAv in middle-aged women. More than 70% of the variance in CRF can be explained by factors other than PA, particularly %BF, suggesting that CRF may not be an appropriate surrogate for PA.

top of page