Home > Journals > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness > Past Issues > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2004 June;44(2) > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2004 June;44(2):119-25

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
To subscribe PROMO
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints

 

Original articles  EXERCISE PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOMECHANICS 

The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2004 June;44(2):119-25

Copyright © 2009 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Concentric quadriceps and hamstrings isokinetic strength in volleyball and soccer players

Magalhães J. 1, Oliveira J. 2, Ascensão A. 1, Soares J. 1

1 Department of Sports Biology Faculty of Sport Sciences and Physical Education University of Porto, Porto, Portugal 2 Department of Sports Training Faculty of Sport Sciences and Physical Education University of Porto, Porto, Portugal


PDF


Aim. Mus­cular ­strength is one of the ­most impor­tant com­po­nents of ­sport, ­both for ­high per­for­mance and for ­injury pre­ven­tion. One of the ­most ­used ­methods to ­assess ­strength ­muscle bal­ance ­between dom­i­nant (D)/non-dom­i­nant (ND) and antag­o­nist/ago­nist is iso­ki­netic ­testing. The ­main pur­pose of the ­present ­study was to ­describe and to com­pare iso­ki­netic ­strength pro­files (­peak ­torque, bilat­eral ­strength dif­fer­ences ­between D/ND leg (BD) and ham­strings/quad­ri­ceps (H/Q) ­ratio) in ath­letes of dif­ferent ­sports and posi­tional ­roles.
­Methods. ­Twenty-­eight ­elite vol­ley­ball ­players and 47 pro ­soccer ­players (goal­keepers, n=5; ­full-­backs, n=7; ­defenders, n=10; mid­fielders, n=15; for­wards, n=10) ­were eval­u­ated ­using an iso­ki­netic dyna­mom­eter (­Biodex-­System 2). Max­imal ­gravity cor­rected con­cen­tric ­peak ­torque of ­knee ­extensor and ­flexor mus­cles ­were meas­ured at ­angular veloc­ities of 360°.s-1 (6.28 rad•s-1) and 90°.s-1 (1.57 rad.s-1).
­Results. No sig­nif­i­cant BD ­were ­found ­between ­soccer and vol­ley­ball ­players ­with excep­tion of ham­strings at 90°.s-1 (­soccer: 10.6±8.0% vs vol­ley­ball: 6.9±5.5%). The H/Q ­ratio was sig­nif­i­cantly ­lower in vol­ley­ball ­players at 90°.s-1 (D: ­soccer 57.4±6.7% vs vol­ley­ball 50.4±7.2%; ND: ­soccer: 56.1±8.2% vs vol­ley­ball: 50.5±6.4%). No sig­nif­i­cant dif­fer­ences ­were ­found for BD and H/Q ­ratio in ­soccer ­players of dif­ferent posi­tional ­roles.
Con­clu­sion. In gen­eral, ­soccer and vol­ley­ball ­players do not ­seem to be dif­ferent con­cerning BD ­although a sig­nif­i­cant dif­fer­ence was ­observed in ham­strings at 90°.s-1. More­over, our ­data sug­gest ­that spe­cific ­demands of ­these ­sports and the dif­ferent posi­tional ­roles in ­soccer did not ­induce bilat­eral leg imbal­ances. How­ever, ­sport ­demands ­seem to influ­ence iso­ki­netic con­cen­tric H/Q ­ratio.

top of page