Home > Journals > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness > Past Issues > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2002 March;42(1) > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2002 March;42(1):113-9

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints
Permissions

 

Original articles  SPORT PSYCHOLOGY 

The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2002 March;42(1):113-9

Copyright © 2009 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Evaluation of a university course aimed at promoting exercise behavior

Cardinal B. J. 1, Jacques K. M. 2, Levy S. S. 3

1 Department of Exercise and Sport Science Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA 2 National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA 3 Department of Exercise and Nutritional Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, USA


PDF


Background. This ­study ­assessed a 10-­week, uni­ver­sity-­required lifetime fitness for health (LFH) ­course on ­students’ lei­sure-­time exer­cise behav­ior and advance­ment ­through the stag­es of ­change for exer­cise.
Methods. Experimental ­design: a qua­si-experi­men­tal ­design was ­employed. Setting: pub­lic uni­ver­sity locat­ed in the United States. Participants: a ­total of 540 stu­dents who ­were ­enrolled in an LFH ­course or select­ed psy­chol­o­gy cours­es vol­un­teered to par­tic­i­pate in ­this ­study. Intervention: a 30-­hour LFH ­course admin­is­tered ­over 10 ­weeks. The ­course was deliv­ered ­both in a lec­ture and lab for­mat. The con­trol con­di­tion con­sist­ed of psy­chol­o­gy cours­es. Measures: week­ly lei­sure-­time exer­cise behav­ior and ­stage of ­change for exer­cise behav­ior ­were ­assessed ­using val­id and reli­able ­self-­report ques­tion­naires at pre- and post­-inter­ven­tion.
Results. Regardless of ­course, ­students’ ­showed min­i­mal chang­es in ­their exer­cise lev­els ­from pre- to post-­inter­ven­tion. Moreover, stu­dents in the LFH ­course did not ­improve ­their ­stage of ­change for exer­cise behav­ior as ­much stu­dents in the psy­chol­o­gy cours­es. Regardless of ­course, ­participants’ ­stage of ­change for exer­cise was an impor­tant mod­er­a­tor var­i­able asso­ciat­ed ­with exer­cise behav­ior ­change.
Conclusions. As was ­taught, the LFH ­course did lit­tle to ­change the ­participants’ exer­cise lev­els out­side of ­class, and did lit­tle to pos­i­tive­ly influ­ence the ­participants’ ­stage of ­change for exer­cise behav­ior.

top of page