Home > Journals > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness > Past Issues > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2001 June;41(2) > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2001 June;41(2):243-9

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Publishing options
eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints
Permissions
Share

 

Original articles   

The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2001 June;41(2):243-9

Copyright © 2002 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Calcaneal bone mineral and ultrasound attenuation in male athletes exposed to weight-bearing and nonweight-bearing activity. A cross-sectional report

Taaffe D. R., Suominen H., Ollikainen S., Cheng S.

From the Department of Health Sciences University of Jyväskylä, Finland


PDF


Background. To deter­mine if the expect­ed dif­fer­enc­es in ­bone min­er­al con­tent/den­sity of the cal­can­eus ­among ­male ath­let­ic ­groups ­that under­take ­weight-bear­ing and non­weight-bear­ing activ­ity are ­also appar­ent for ­bone “qual­ity” as ­assessed by quan­ti­ta­tive ultra­sound (QUS) atten­u­a­tion.
Methods. Experimental ­design: ­cross-sec­tion­al. Setting: a University ­research labor­a­to­ry. Participants: we stud­ied 30 ­young men: 10 Finnish nation­al lev­el jump­ers ­whose train­ing incor­po­rates repeat­ed ­impacts to the ­heel, 10 aquat­ics ath­letes ­whose skele­tons are ­exposed to non­weight-bear­ing activ­ity, and 10 sed­en­tary men ­matched for age and ­body ­weight. Measures: ­bone min­er­al con­tent (BMC, g·cm-1), ­areal ­bone min­er­al den­sity (BMDa; g·cm-2) and pre­sumed vol­u­met­ric BMD (BMDv, g·cm-3) was meas­ured by sin­gle ener­gy pho­ton absorp­tion (SPA). Broadband ultra­sound atten­u­a­tion (BUA ­using Fourier spec­tral esti­ma­tion and UBI-4 ­using Burg spec­tral esti­ma­tion, ­both in db/MHz) was ­assessed by a new QUS ­device (QUS-1TM, Metra Biosystems).
Results. There was no dif­fer­ence in ­years of ­sport spe­cif­ic train­ing or ­total train­ing ­time per ­week ­between ath­lete ­groups. BMC, BMDa and BMDv ­were sig­nif­i­cant­ly dif­fer­ent ­among ­groups (p=0.0001) ­with jump­ers ­being high­er ­than aquat­ics ath­letes and con­trols. BMC of jump­ers was 52% and 39% high­er ­than con­trols and aquat­ics ath­letes, respec­tive­ly, ­while the cor­re­spond­ing val­ues for BMDv ­were 34% and 28%. However, BUA val­ues ­were not sig­nif­i­cant­ly dif­fer­ent (p=0.10) ­among ­groups nor was UBI-4 (p=0.03; jump­ers val­ues ­were 7% and 6% high­er ­than aquat­ics ath­letes and con­trols, respec­tive­ly).
Conclusions. These ­cross-sec­tion­al ­results indi­cate ­that ­bone min­er­al con­tent and den­sity of the cal­can­eus are sub­stan­tial­ly high­er in jump­ers ­than indi­vid­u­als ­engaged in non­weight-bear­ing or reg­u­lar ­weight-bear­ing activ­ity. However, param­e­ters ­assessed by QUS atten­u­a­tion are not mark­ed­ly dif­fer­ent, ­which sug­gests ­that ­bone “qual­ity” prop­er­ties may not be as respon­sive as ­that of ­bone min­er­al con­tent/den­sity to habit­u­al skel­e­tal load­ing.

top of page