Home > Journals > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness > Past Issues > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 1998 March;38(1) > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 1998 March;38(1):35-8

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Publishing options
eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints
Permissions
Share

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLES   

The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 1998 March;38(1):35-8

Copyright © 1998 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

The use of a fixed value of RPE during a ramp protocol. Comparison with the ventilatory threshold

Feriche B. 1, Chicharro J. L. 2, Vaquero A. F. 2, Pérez M. 2, Lucia A. 2

1 Departamento de Educación Física, Facultad de Ciencias de la Actividad Física y el Deporte, Universidad de Granada, Spain; 2 Unidad de Investigación, Escuela de Medicina del Deporte, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain


PDF


Back­ground. The pur­pose of our inves­ti­ga­tion was to ­assess the use of a ­fixed val­ue (12-13) of the Rat­ing of Per­ceived Exer­tion (RPE) ­scale (6-20) as a val­id meth­od for the deter­mi­na­tion of the work­load cor­re­spond­ing to the ven­til­a­to­ry thresh­old (VT) dur­ing a ­ramp pro­to­col on a ­cycle ergom­e­ter.
Meth­ods. ­Eleven ­trained ­cyclists (22±3 ­years of age; V.O2max: 65.2±12.4 ml·kg-1·min-1) ­were select­ed as sub­jects.
­Design. ­Each of the sub­jects per­formed a ­ramp pro­to­col on a ­cycle ergom­e­ter (start­ing at 25 W, ­with increas­es of 25 W·min-1 ­until exhaus­tion). Gas ­exchange ­data ­were ana­lysed con­tin­u­al­ly dur­ing the ­test to ­detect the ven­til­a­to­ry thresh­old (VT) of the sub­jects. In addi­tion val­ues of RPE ­were ­obtained ­from ­each sub­ject in the ­last 15 sec of ­each 2-min­ute-inter­val dur­ing the ­tests, and imme­di­ate­ly ­after exhaus­tion. The RPE thresh­old (­RPET) was ­defined as a con­stant val­ue of 12-13. ­Mean val­ues of VT and ­RPET ­were ­expressed as V.O2 (ml·kg-1·min-1), %V.O2max, ­heart ­rate (bpm) and pow­er out­put (W), and ­were com­pared ­using a ­paired “t”-­test.
­Results. No sig­nif­i­cant dif­fer­ence (p<0.05) was ­found ­between ­mean val­ues of VT and ­RPET, ­when ­both param­e­ters ­where ­expressed ­either as V.O2, %V.O2max, ­heart ­rate, or pow­er out­put.
Con­clu­sions. In con­clu­sion, a ­fixed val­ue (12-13) of the RPE ­scale ­might be ­used to ­detect the exer­cise inten­sity cor­re­spond­ing to VT. ­Such param­e­ter may there­fore be ­used for exer­cise pre­scrip­tion in sub­sti­tu­tion to ­more sophis­ti­cat­ed meth­o­dol­o­gies.

top of page