Home > Journals > Journal of Radiological Review > Past Issues > Journal of Radiological Review 2020 July-August;7(4) > Journal of Radiological Review 2020 July-August;7(4):241-9

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Publishing options
eTOC
To subscribe
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as
Share

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLES   

Journal of Radiological Review 2020 July-August;7(4):241-9

DOI: 10.23736/S2723-9284.20.00037-6

Copyright © 2020 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English, Italian

Comparison between the Bhalla and Magnin CT scores in primary ciliary dyskinesia

Roberto CASTELLANA 1 , Chiara ROMEI 2, Alessandra SCIONTI 1, Martina PIRAS 3, Serena GRACCI 3, Silvia PRADELLA 4, Vittorio MIELE 4, Elena BERTELLI 4, Giacomo ARINGHIERI 1

1 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; 2 2end Unit of Radiology, University-Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; 3 Section of Pneumology and Allergology, Unit of Pediatrics, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; 4 Department of Radiology, AOU Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy


PDF


BACKGROUND: The aim of this article is to compare two CT pulmonary scoring systems utilized in the assessment of patients with primary ciliary dyskinesia: the Bhalla and Magnin scores. Both scores have a well-known correlation with pulmonary function tests.
METHODS: A cohort of 54 patients with primary ciliary dyskinesia was evaluated with both CT scores by three radiologists, each with a different amount of experience (1, 5 and 10 years) in reporting lung CTs. The scoring time was measured with a stopwatch. To evaluate the inter-reader agreement, the intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated. Pearson correlation was used to assess the relation between the two CT scores for each reader. Paired sample t-test was utilized in evaluating scoring time with both the Bhalla and the Magnin scores.
RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for the Bhalla and Magnin scores were 0.84 (95% CI: 0.743-0.93), and 0.748 (95% CI: 0.637-0.834). The CT scores were strongly correlated for each reader (rs>0.8; P<0.001). The Magnin scoring time was significantly different from the Bhalla score and required more time (mean 23±22%).
CONCLUSIONS: The Bhalla score has a higher inter-reader reliability and requires less scoring time than the Magnin Score.


KEY WORDS: Ciliary motility disorders; Validation study; Observer variation

top of page