Home > Journals > Journal of Radiological Review > Past Issues > Il Giornale Italiano di Radiologia Medica 2018 Marzo-Aprile;5(2) > Il Giornale Italiano di Radiologia Medica 2018 Marzo-Aprile;5(2):202-7

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
To subscribe PROMO
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE   

Il Giornale Italiano di Radiologia Medica 2018 Marzo-Aprile;5(2):202-7

DOI: 10.23736/S2283-8376.18.00046-3

Copyright © 2018 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: Italian

Intravascular foreign body retrieval: single center experience

Fabio CORVINO 1 , Antonio MACERA 2, Francesco GIURAZZA 1, Gianluca CANGIANO 1, Mattia SILVESTRE 1, Enrico CAVAGLIÀ 1, Francesco AMODIO 1, Giuseppe DE MAGISTRIS 1, Antonio CORVINO 3, Raffaella NIOLA 1

1 Dipartimento di Radiologia Interventistica, AORN “A. Cardarelli”, Napoli, Italia; 2 Dipartimento di Bioscienze Mediche Avanzate, Università Federico II, Istituto di Biostrutture e Bioimmagini (IBB), Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), Napoli, Italia; 3 Università degli Studi di Napoli “Parthenope”, Napoli, Italia


PDF


BACKGROUND: Demonstrate the role of endovascular technique for the retrieval of lost or misplaced intravascular objects reviewing our 10-years experience.
METHODS: From January 2008 to January 2018, 82 patients (48 M and 34 F; mean age 55.5±18) referred to our department for endovascular retrieval of intravascular foreign objects. Exact removal procedure technique, success rate and procedure-related complications were assessed.
RESULTS: In 38/82 (46%) cases foreign objects were located in peripheral venous system, in 29/82 (35%) in right heart (atrium, ventricle or both) and in 15/82 (19%) cases in a pulmonary artery or in its main trunk. For foreign object removal Amplatz “goose neck” loop was used successfully alone in 75/82 cases (91.5%) and in 7 cases (8.5%) a combination of pig-tail or Sidewinder 1 catheter and snare loop was used. Primary success was achieved in 72/82 cases (88%); in 3 cases (4%) foreign objects were mobilized but surgically removed. In 7 cases (8%) foreign objects removal was not possible. In 4 of 82 cases (5%) minor complications occurred during procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous retrieval of lost or misplaced intravascular objects is an effective and efficient technique, with a very few minor complications.


KEY WORDS: Complications - Foreign bodies - Device removal

top of page