Home > Journals > Panminerva Medica > Past Issues > Panminerva Medica 2010 September;52(3) > Panminerva Medica 2010 September;52(3):209-16

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Publishing options
eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints
Permissions
Share

 

REVIEWS  IMAGING AND FOCAL THERAPY IN PROSTATE AND KIDNEY CANCER PART I: FOCUS ON PROSTATE 

Panminerva Medica 2010 September;52(3):209-16

Copyright © 2010 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Prostate cancer multifocality: impact on cancer biology and treatment recommendations

Delacroix S. E., Ward J. F.

The University of Texas, Anderson Cancer Center Houston, TX, USA


PDF


Subtotal ablative therapies may be a compromise between radical therapy and active surveillance, but oncologic efficacy and quantification of the side effects need to be evaluated in clinical trials. Depending on the eligibility criteria and ablative templates performed, trials of subtotal therapy have the opportunity to provide the scientific community with probative data regarding the biologic and clinical significance of index lesions and further support the hypothesis that multifocality of disease is rarely clinically relevant. This article will review the contemporary pathologic data assessing the intraprostatic heterogeneity of clinically localized prostate cancer and discuss the implications of multifocal disease on clinical trials involving subtotal ablative therapies. We will also discuss limitations in the current definitions of clinical significance as well as the limitations of our current staging techniques.

top of page