![]() |
JOURNAL TOOLS |
Publishing options |
eTOC |
To subscribe |
Submit an article |
Recommend to your librarian |
ARTICLE TOOLS |
Reprints |
Permissions |
Share |


YOUR ACCOUNT
YOUR ORDERS
SHOPPING BASKET
Items: 0
Total amount: € 0,00
HOW TO ORDER
YOUR SUBSCRIPTIONS
YOUR ARTICLES
YOUR EBOOKS
COUPON
ACCESSIBILITY
REVIEWS IMAGING AND FOCAL THERAPY IN PROSTATE AND KIDNEY CANCER PART I: FOCUS ON PROSTATE
Panminerva Medica 2010 September;52(3):209-16
Copyright © 2010 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA
language: English
Prostate cancer multifocality: impact on cancer biology and treatment recommendations
Delacroix S. E., Ward J. F. ✉
The University of Texas, Anderson Cancer Center Houston, TX, USA
Subtotal ablative therapies may be a compromise between radical therapy and active surveillance, but oncologic efficacy and quantification of the side effects need to be evaluated in clinical trials. Depending on the eligibility criteria and ablative templates performed, trials of subtotal therapy have the opportunity to provide the scientific community with probative data regarding the biologic and clinical significance of index lesions and further support the hypothesis that multifocality of disease is rarely clinically relevant. This article will review the contemporary pathologic data assessing the intraprostatic heterogeneity of clinically localized prostate cancer and discuss the implications of multifocal disease on clinical trials involving subtotal ablative therapies. We will also discuss limitations in the current definitions of clinical significance as well as the limitations of our current staging techniques.