Home > Journals > The Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging > Past Issues > Articles online first > The Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2022 Jun 28

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Publishing options
eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as
Share

 

Original Article   

The Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2022 Jun 28

DOI: 10.23736/S1824-4785.22.03452-5

Copyright © 2022 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Toxicity comparison of yttrium-90 resin and glass microspheres radioembolization

Manon N. BRAAT , Arthur J. BRAAT, Marnix G. LAM

Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands



BACKGROUND: To investigate the clinical, hematological and biochemical toxicity differences between glass and resin yttrium-90 (90Y)-microspheres radioembolization treatment of primary and metastatic liver disease.
METHODS: Between May 2014 and November 2016 all consecutive glass and resin 90Y microspheres radioembolization treatments were retrospectively analyzed. Biochemical, hematological and clinical data were collected at treatment day, two weeks, one month and three months follow-up. Post-treatment 90Y PET/CTs were assessed for the absorbed doses in non-tumorous liver volume (DNTLV) and tumor volume (DTV). Biochemical, hematological and clinical toxicity were compared between glass and resin using chi square tests and repeated ANOVA measures. Biochemical and clinical toxicity was correlated with DNTLV,total by means of Pearson correlation and independent T-tests.
RESULTS: A total of 85 patients were included (n=44 glass, n=41 resin). Clinical toxicity the day after treatment (i.e. abdominal pain (p=0.000), nausea (p=0.000) and vomiting (p=0.003)) was more prevalent for resin. Biochemical and hematological toxicities were similar for both microspheres. The DNTLV,total was significantly higher in patients with REILD grade ≥3 in the resin group (43.5 versus 33.3 Gy (p=0.050)). A similar non-significant trend was seen in the glass group: 95.0 versus 69.0 Gy (p=0.144).
CONCLUSIONS: The clinical, hematological and biochemical toxicity of radioembolization treatment with glass and resin is comparable, however, post-embolization syndrome related complaints are more common for resin.


KEY WORDS: Microspheres; Liver; Toxicity; Radiation

top of page