Home > Journals > The Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging > Past Issues > The Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2017 December;61(4) > The Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2017 December;61(4):345-59

CURRENT ISSUE
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Cite this article as

THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING

A Journal on Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging


A Journal on Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Affiliated to the Society of Radiopharmaceutical Sciences and to the International Research Group of Immunoscintigraphy
Indexed/Abstracted in: Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 2,481


eTOC

 

REVIEW  NEWS AND VIEWS ON CLINICAL NEUROIMAGING


The Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2017 December;61(4):345-59

DOI: 10.23736/S1824-4785.17.03008-4

Copyright © 2017 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Brain PET and functional MRI: why simultaneously using hybrid PET/MR systems?

Diego CECCHIN 1, 2 , Alessandro PALOMBIT 2, 3, Marco CASTELLARO 2, 3, Erica SILVESTRI 2, 3, Franco BUI 1, Henryk BARTHEL 4, Osama SABRI 4, Maurizio CORBETTA 2, 5, Alessandra BERTOLDO 2, 3

1 Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine, DIMED, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy; 2 Padua Neuroscience Center, University of Padua, Padua, Italy; 3 Bioingeneer, Department of Information Engineering, University of Padua, Padua, Italy; 4 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany; 5 Department of Neuroscience, University of Padua, Padua, Italy


PDF  


INTRODUCTION: In the last 20 years growing attention has been devoted to multimodal imaging. The recent literature is rich of clinical and research studies that have been performed using different imaging modalities on both separate and integrated positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance (MR) scanners. However, today, hybrid PET/MR systems measure signals related to brain structure, metabolism, neurochemistry, perfusion, and neuronal activity simultaneously, i.e. in the same physiological conditions. A frequently raised question at meeting and symposia is: “Do we really need a hybrid PET/MR system? Are there any advantages over acquiring sequential and separate PET and MR scans?” The present paper is an attempt to answer these questions specifically in relation to PET combined with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and arterial spin labeling.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We searched (last update: June 2017) the databases PubMed, PMC, Google Scholar and Medline. We also included additional studies if they were cited in the selected articles. No language restriction was applied to the search, but the reviewed articles were all in English. Among all the retrieved articles, we selected only those performed using a hybrid PET/MR system. We found a total of 17 papers that were selected and discussed in three main groups according to the main radiopharmaceutical used: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) (N.=8), 15O-water (15O-H2O) (N.=3) and neuroreceptors (N.=6).
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Concerning studies using 18F-FDG, simultaneous PET/fMRI revealed that global aspects of functional organization (e.g. graph properties of functional connections) are partially associated with energy consumption. There are remarkable spatial and functional similarities across modalities, but also discrepant findings. More work is needed on this point. There are only a handful of papers comparing blood flow measurements with PET 15O-H2O and MR arterial spin label (ASL) measures, and they show significant regional CBF differences between these two modalities. However, at least in one study the correlation at the level of gray, white matter, and whole brain is rather good (r=0.94, 0.8, 0.81 respectively). Finally, receptor studies show that simultaneous PET/fMRI could be a useful tool to characterize functional connectivity along with dynamic neuroreceptor adaptation in several physiological (e.g. working memory) or pathological (e.g. pain) conditions, with or without drug administrations.
CONCLUSIONS: The simultaneous acquisition of PET (using a number of radiotracers) and functional MRI (using a number of sequences) offers exciting opportunities that we are just beginning to explore. The results thus far are promising in the evaluation of cerebral metabolism/flow, neuroreceptor adaptation, and network’s energetic demand.


KEY WORDS: Magnetic resonance imaging - Positron-emission tomography - Sensory receptor cells

top of page

Publication History

Issue published online: September 20, 2017
Article first published online: July 27, 2017
Manuscript accepted: July 25, 2017
Manuscript received: June 30, 2017

Cite this article as

Cecchin D, Palombit A, Castellaro M, Silvestri E, Bui F, Barthel H, et al. Brain PET and functional MRI: why simultaneously using hybrid PET/MR systems? Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2017;61:345-59. DOI: 10.23736/S1824-4785.17.03008-4

Corresponding author e-mail

diego.cecchin@unipd.it