ORIGINAL ARTICLES   

The Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular imaging 2010 December;54(6):689-97

Copyright © 2011 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

18[F]FDG small animal PET study of sorafenib efficacy in lymphoma preclinical models

Ambrosini V., Quarta C., Zinzani P. L., Nanni C., Fini M., Torricelli P., Giavaresi G., D’Errico-Grigioni A., Malvi D., Franchi R., Fanti S. ✉

¹ Department of Nuclear Medicine, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna University Hospital, Bologna, Italy; ² Department of Hematology, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna University Hospital, Bologna, Italy; ³ Laboratory of Preclinical Surgical Studies, Istituti Ortopedici Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy; ⁴ Department of Pathology,Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna University Hospital,Bologna, Italy

AIM: Kinase inhibitors have been proposed as novel therapeutic agents in different forms of solid tumours. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the use of Sorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor, for advanced renal carcinoma and unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. On-going studies are investigating the efficacy of Sorafenib in other solid tumours such as melanoma and non-small cells lung carcinoma and pre-clinical models showed the efficacy of treatment with Sorafenib in murine models of renal cells carcinoma, breast cancer, colon carcinoma and melanoma. To our knowledge, Sorafenib has never been employed in human lymphoma. The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy of Sorafenib in murine models of human anaplastic large cells lymphoma (ALCL) and Hodgkin lymphoma (HD).
METHODS: Sorafenib cytotoxicity was assessed in vitro and growth inhibition (IC50) was calculated. Cells were assayed for Caspase-3 to measure apoptosis. Human ALCL and HD xenografts in NOD/SCID mice were monitored by small animal positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) over time. Tumour bearing animals were randomly selected to receive treatment with Sorafenib or no treatment. Pathology was available in all cases.
RESULTS: Sorafenib efficacy on cells proliferation and apoptosis (IC50: HD=0.0343mg/L; ALCL=0.319 mg/L) was confirmed in vitro. Caspase-3 production showed a dose-dependent trend reaching significantly higher values for 0.046mg/L and 0.465mg/L drug concentrations in both cell lines. In vivo experiments showed a progressive increase of tumour lesions metabolism and dimensions regardless treatment.
CONCLUSION: Sorafenib showed a good citotoxic effect in vitro especially on human HD cell line, but these findings were not confirmed in vivo. The strong discrepancy between in vitro and in vivo results suggests that further studies are needed to better acknowledge the biodistribution and metabolism of Sorafenib in NOD/SCID mice. Factors influencing drug availability at tumour site or differences in the downstream pathways may be responsible for the scarse effect of treatment.