Home > Journals > The Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging > Past Issues > The Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2002 December;46(4) > The Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2002 December;46(4):323-30

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Publishing options
eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints
Permissions
Share

 

  ORIGINAL ARTICLES 

The Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2002 December;46(4):323-30

Copyright © 2009 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Nuclear medicine procedures in cardiovascular diseases. An evidence based approach

Acampa W. 1, 3, Petretta M. 2, Cuocolo A. 1, 3

1 Department of Biomorphological and Functional Sciences Biostructure and Bioimaging Institute of the National Council of Research (CNR), Naples, Italy 2 Institute of Internal Medicine, Cardiology and Heart Surgery University Federico II, Naples, Italy 3 RCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy


PDF


The aim of evi­dence-­based med­i­cine is to inte­grate indi­vidual clin­ical exper­tise ­with the ­best avail­able ­external clin­ical evi­dence ­from system­atic ­research. The aim of ­this ­article is to intro­duce the con­cept of evi­dence ­based med­i­cine and to ­review the evi­dence for ­applying car­di­o­vas­cular ­nuclear med­i­cine in var­ious clin­ical set­tings. A system­atic ­review is ­defined as a sci­en­tific tech­nique to iden­tify and sum­marize evi­dence on effec­tive­ness of inter­ven­tions and to ­allow the con­sis­tency of ­research. Dif­ferent clin­ical appli­ca­tions of ­nuclear med­i­cine pro­ce­dures in car­di­ology ­have ­been ­reviewed. Radio­nu­clide ­imaging tech­niques ­appear to be appro­priate in ­risk assess­ment, prog­nosis and eval­u­a­tion of ­therapy in ­patients ­after ­acute myo­car­dial infarc­tion. In ­patients ­with ­unstable ­angina, radio­nu­clide ­testing is indi­cated in the iden­tifi­ca­tion of ­ischemia ­within the dis­tri­bu­tion of the “cul­prit” ­lesion or in ­remote ­areas. Exer­cise and phar­mac­o­log­ical car­diac per­fu­sion ­imaging are appro­priate and ­useful in the diag­nosis and prog­nosis of ­chronic cor­o­nary ­artery dis­ease. ­Nuclear med­i­cine pro­ce­dures are ­also ­useful in the assess­ment of myo­car­dial ­viability in ­patients ­with ­left ven­tric­ular dys­func­tion, in the assess­ment of inter­ven­tions for the eval­u­a­tion of ­patients ­after per­cut­aneous trans­lu­minal cor­o­nary angio­plasty and cor­o­nary ­artery ­bypass ­grafting. ­There has ­been ­rapid evo­lu­tion in radio­nu­clide ­imaging tech­nol­o­gies and ­both the ­number and the com­plexity of ­choices for the cli­ni­cian ­have ­increased. Fur­ther ­progress in tech­nology and clin­ical appli­ca­tions of ­nuclear car­di­ology may be ­expected. The devel­op­ment of new instru­men­ta­tion and of new ­agents ­will ­allow con­sis­tent ­progress and ­improve the ­state-of-art of ­nuclear car­di­ology. ­Thus, guide­lines for the use of car­diac radio­nu­clide ­imaging ­have ­been dif­fi­cult to ­develop and ­apply. An evi­dence-­based ­approach may be ­useful for the ­best use of ­nuclear med­i­cine pro­ce­dures in car­di­o­vas­cular dis­eases.

top of page