ORIGINAL ARTICLE   

Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences 2023 May 09

DOI: 10.23736/S0390-5616.23.05991-X

Copyright © 2023 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

The impact of surgical set-up of endoscopic two surgeon four hand anterior skull base surgeries on surgeons’ ergonomics

Pavithran MANIAM ¹ ✉, James LUCOCQ ¹, Rohit GOHIL ¹, Ashok ROKADE ²

¹ Department of Otolaryngology, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK; ² Department of Otolaryngology, Royal Hampshire County Hospital, Winchester, UK

BACKGROUND: The impact of different surgical set-ups of endoscopic two surgeon four hand anterior skull base surgeries on surgeons’ ergonomics remain unclear. This study aims to explore the effect of surgeon, patient and surgical screen positioning on surgeons’ ergonomics using the Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) tool.
METHODS: A total of 20 different surgical positions of anterior skull base surgery were simulated and the ergonomic impact on surgeons’ neck, truck, leg and wrist were measured using the validated Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) tool. To investigate the ergonomic effect of different surgical setups, the operating surgeon, assisting surgeon, patient head, camera and screen positions were positioned differently in each surgical position.
RESULTS: The lowest REBA Score recorded is 3 whereas the highest score is 8. The REBA scores for the majority of positions are 3 highlighting that these positions are ergonomically favorable. Position 12 is the least ergonomically favorable position with a total REBA score of 19. In this position, operating surgeon is positioned to the right of the patient, assisting surgeon to the left of patient, patient head in central position with camera held by operating surgeon and one screen is placed to the right of patient. Positions 13 and 17 are the most ergonomically favorable positions with a total REBA score of 12. In these positions, the patient’s head is positioned to the center, two screens were utilized, and the surgeons were positioned on either side of the patient. The utilization of 2 screens with a central patient head position with the surgeons placed on either side of the patient contribute towards a more ergonomically state in these positions.
CONCLUSIONS: Certain positional behaviors are better at reducing musculoskeletal injury risk when compared to other. Positions with two screens and central head positions are more favourable ergonomically and surgeons should consider this set-up to reduce musculoskeletal injuries during anterior skull base surgery.

KEY WORDS: Ergonomics; Skull base; Occupational injuries