Home > Journals > Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences > Past Issues > Articles online first > Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences 2021 Jan 04

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
To subscribe PROMO
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as
Share

 

 

Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences 2021 Jan 04

DOI: 10.23736/S0390-5616.20.05135-8

Copyright © 2020 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

The interlaminar contralateral approach to far-lateral lumbar disc herniations: a singlecenter comparison with traditional techniques and literature review

Andrea DI RITA 1 , Vincenzo LEVI 1, Giulia L. GRIBAUDI 1, Giuseppe CASACELI 1, Giovanni DI LEO 2, Luigi V. BERRA 3, Marcello EGIDI 1

1 Department of Neurosurgery, San Carlo Borromeo Hospital, Milan, Italy; 2 Radiology Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy; 3 Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy


PDF


BACKGROUND: The interlaminar contralateral approach (ICA) is a promising surgical alternative for the treatment of far-lateral lumbar disc herniations (FLLDH). To date no study has compared ICA and FLLDH conventional surgical treatments, namely the intertransverse, the transmuscular and the intermuscular approaches, in terms of safety and outcome.
METHODS: Patients who underwent FLLDH surgery at our Institution between January 2015 and September 2018 were reviewed. ICA complications and clinical outcomes were compared with those of conventional approaches at 1-month post-operatively and at the last follow-up available. Improvement was defined as reduction of at least two point in the visual analogue scale (VAS) or increase of at least 1 point in the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale of muscle strength. Patient-reported outcome was assessed with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).
RESULTS: Among 38 patients, 18 underwent ICA and 20 a conventional approach (intertransverse in 16, transmuscular in 2, intermuscular in 2). Median follow-up was 21 months (range, 2-47). At 1 month, no differences between the two groups were noticed in terms of clinical outcome and symptoms relief (p> 0.05). The median post-operative ODI score was significantly lower in the Conventional approach group at 1 month (p<0.05), but this difference was no longer significant at the last follow-up evaluation (p>0.05). No differences were found between the two groups in surgical complication and recurrence rates.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the ICA is a safe and effective alternative to conventional approaches in FLLDH surgery. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm our results.


KEY WORDS: Radiculopathy; Low back pain; Microsurgery; Minimally invasive surgical procedures

top of page