Home > Journals > Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences > Past Issues > Articles online first > Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences 2018 Oct 23

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as

 

 

Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences 2018 Oct 23

DOI: 10.23736/S0390-5616.18.04555-1

Copyright © 2018 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Clinical and radiological outcomes following open door laminoplasty: a single center evolution of the technique

Francesco SIGNORELLI , Gianluca TREVISI, Federico BIANCHI, Carmelo ANILE, Angelo POMPUCCI

Institute of Neurosurgery. Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy


PDF


BACKGROUND: A comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes after two different variants of open door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is described.
METHODS: Fifty-five patients underwent cervical laminoplasty for CSM. Between 2005 to 2009, 32 patients underwent open-door laminoplasty (Group A) performed with a monolateral exposure with contralateral “green stick” laminar fracture. A technical variant consisting in bilateral exposure, spinous process removal and symmetrical muscular closure was applied in the other 23 (Group B), from 2009 to 2016. A retrospective analysis of surgical results between the two groups was performed.
RESULTS: In group B, the mean operative time was longer and the mean volume of intraoperative blood loss was much higher than in group A. Both differences were not significant (p=0.1601 and p=0.0884, respectively). The average hospitalization was nonsignificantly longer in group B (7.3±1.8 vs. 6.5±1.6 d; p= 0.0947). Postoperatively, axial neck pain was more severe in group A at last follow-up than preoperatively (P>0.05). mJOA scores and Nurick grades improved significantly in both groups at last follow-up; in group A, the mean recovery rates were 41.5 % by mJOA scores and 29.4 % by Nurick grades, whereas in group B they were 52.7 % and 36.8 %, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Applying some few variations to a standard monolateral approach, although slightly more time and blood consuming, could reduce the incidence of long term axial symptoms and, in our experience, are not burdened by worsening of outcomes. A prospective, multicentric study with a longer follow-up should be conducted in order to confirm our findings.


KEY WORDS: Cervical myelopathy - Cervical laminoplasty - Open door laminoplasty

top of page