Home > Journals > Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences > Past Issues > Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences 2021 August;65(4) > Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences 2021 August;65(4):391-6

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
To subscribe PROMO
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as
Share

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE   

Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences 2021 August;65(4):391-6

DOI: 10.23736/S0390-5616.18.04513-7

Copyright © 2018 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Intraoperative compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) amplitude changes after decompression and neurolysis of peripheral nerves in upper limbs neuropathies: electrophysiologial considerations and relation with clinical outcome

Ignazio G. VETRANO 1 , Roberto CORDELLA 1, Irene TRAMACERE 2, Vittoria NAZZI 1

1 Department of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Carlo Besta Neurologic Institute Foundation, Milan, Italy; 2 Department of Research and Clinical Development, Scientific Directorate, IRCCS Carlo Besta Neurologic Institute Foundation, Milan, Italy



BACKGROUND: Decompression and, when necessary, neurolysis in entrapment neuropathies of upper limbs are effective and safe procedures, but their correlation with the variation of compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) is still unclear, based in particular on experimental models. In addition, there are few data regarding the efficacy of intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IOM) to predict clinical early and late outcome after surgery in term of pain control and sensitive/motor recovery. We report about the association between the intraoperative anatomical and neurophysiological findings and the mid- and long-term postoperative clinical course in a surgical series.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinical data of 24 patients among 68 admitted at our Institution for upper limb neuropathies from September 2012 to May 2015. All patients completed two preoperative questionnaires for assessing the level of disability (DASH) and of pain/discomfort (NRS). CMAPs’ amplitudes were intraoperatively detected, before and after decompression and neurolysis and the variations were then related to clinical outcome, evaluated through DASH and NRS questionnaires at 6-, 9- and 12-months follow-up.
RESULTS: A statistically significant difference was noted in CMAPs amplitudes before and after decompression (P<0.01). In two patients, this variation was so satisficing to determinate the end of procedure, without the need to perform neurolysis. Major correlations between the variation of CMAPs amplitude after surgery and change of DASH and NRS scores at follow-up were found.
CONCLUSIONS: Variations of CMAPs amplitude provide real-time information on nerves function and may be helpful in predicting mid- and long-term postoperative outcome regarding pain relief and neurological functions.


KEY WORDS: Decompression; Monitoring, intraoperative; Nerve compression syndromes

top of page