Home > Journals > Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences > Past Issues > Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences 2010 June;54(2) > Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences 2010 June;54(2):55-63

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Publishing options
eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints
Permissions
Share

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLES   

Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences 2010 June;54(2):55-63

Copyright © 2010 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Microsurgical endoscopic-assisted retrosigmoid intradural suprameatal approach: anatomical considerations

Acerbi F. 1, 3, Broggi M. 1, 3, Gaini S. M. 1, Tschabitscher M. 2

1 Neurosurgery, Department of Neurological Sciences, University of Milan, Fondazione IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Mangiagalli e Regina Elena, Milan, Italy; 2 Study Group of Microsurgical and Endoscopic Anatomy, Center of Anatomy and Cellbiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; 3 Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico C. Besta, Milan, Italy


PDF


AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of microscopic endoscopic assisted suprameatal tubercle drilling with a retrosigmoid approach and it focuses on the anatomic structures identified with the endoscope. The advantages of the 30° optic view are also described.
METHODS: Fifty dry temporal bones were studied in order to estimate the variability of the prominence of the suprameatal tubercle. Eight fresh cadaveric specimens were prepared for a retrosigmoid approach to allow for microscopic endoscopic assisted suprameatal tubercle drilling. The increase in trigeminal exposure and neurovascular structures visualization with the endoscope, using 0° and 30° optics were then evaluated.
RESULTS: Three major types of the suprameatal tubercle were found: 1) a large size tubercle (>6 mm, 9/50 cases); 2) a medium size tubercle (3-6 mm, 37/50 cases); and 3) an almost absent suprameatal tubercle (<3 mm, 4/50 cases). Microscopic endoscopic assisted suprameatal tubercle drilling with opening of the Meckel’s Cave was found to be technically feasible in all cases. The increase in trigeminal nerve exposition was of 9 mm on average. Endoscopic exploration with 0° and 30° optics made possible the identification of all neurovascular structures in the area.
CONCLUSION: Microscopic endoscopic assisted suprameatal tubercle drilling is a feasible procedure that allows the identification of all neurovascular structures in the cerebellopontine angle and petrous apex region. The opening of Meckel’s Cave may be particularly useful for lesions located in the cerebellopontine angle having a minor component that extends anteriorly and laterally in the middle cranial fossa.

top of page