Home > Journals > Minerva Urology and Nephrology > Past Issues > Articles online first > Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica 2020 Dec 01

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as
Share

 

 

Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica 2020 Dec 01

DOI: 10.23736/S0393-2249.20.04077-1

Copyright © 2020 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

The surgical learning curve for salvage robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective single-surgeon study

Xavier BONET 1, 2 , Marcio C. MOSCHOVAS 2, Fikret F. ONOL 2, Kulthe R. BHAT 2, Travis ROGERS 2, Gabriel OGAYA-PINIES 2, 3, Bernardo ROCCO 2, 4, Maria Chiara SIGHINOLFI 5, Tracey WOODLIEF 6, Francesc VIGUÉS 1, Vipul PATEL 2

1 Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain; 2 Advent Health Global Robotics Institute, Celebration, FL, USA; 3 Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain; 4 University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; 5 Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy; 6 Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, USA



BACKGROUND: To report the overall results and the learning curve (LC) in salvage robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (sRARP) patients, in terms of morbidity, oncological and functional outcomes in a single surgeon tertiary-referral center.
METHODS: One hundred and twenty patients underwent sRARP by a single surgeon (V.P.) from 2008 to 2018. To assess the trends in the learning experience they were sub-divided in 4 groups of 30 consecutive patients based on date of surgery. The Kaplan- Meier method and regression models were used to identify survival estimations and predictors of potency, continence and biochemical failure (BCF) at 12 months.
RESULTS: As the learning experience for sRALP increased operative time (OT) was significantly shorter (from 139,5 to 121 min) and the amount of nerve-sparing (NS) undertaken increased (from 46 to 80%). While complications rate remained stable, estimated blood loss (EBL) and radiographic anastomotic leaks (RAL) decreased through the groups (from 124 to 69 ml and 40% to 16,7%, respectively). BCF and continence rates at 12 months after sRARP were similar among groups (23-36% and 36,7-50%, respectively) and chance of potency rates tended to increase (from 3,3% to 16-23%) but was not statistically significant. In a multivariate analysis, predictors for BCF were PSM and GS 8-10. Non-radiation primary treatment was the unique predictor of continence at 12 months after sRARP.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data may suggest a decreasing trend in terms of OT and EBL through the sRARP learning curve. While morbidity remained stable through the time, radiographic anastomotic leaks trended towards a decline. A higher degree of NS was observed through the groups and there was a slight correlation trend between surgical expertise and potency recovery. PSM and GS 8-10 were predictors of BCF and non-radiation primary treatment predicted a better continence after sRARP.


KEY WORDS: Salvage robotic-assisted prostatectomy; Learning curve; Surgical experience; Surgical technique; Erectile function; Continence

top of page