Home > Journals > Minerva Urology and Nephrology > Past Issues > Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica 2020 February;72(1) > Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica 2020 February;72(1):91-8

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Publishing options
eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as
Share

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE   Free accessfree

Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica 2020 February;72(1):91-8

DOI: 10.23736/S0393-2249.19.03598-7

Copyright © 2019 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Absolok® versus Hem-o-Lok® clips for renorrhaphy during partial nephrectomy for parenchymal renal tumors

Marta ROSSANESE 1, Alessandro CRESTANI 2, Gianluca GIANNARINI 3, Mattia CALANDRIELLO 1, Giuseppe ALARIO 1, Alchiede SIMONATO 4, Vincenzo FICARRA 1

1 Section of Urology, Gaetano Barresi Department of Human and Pediatric Pathology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy; 2 Unit of Urology, Santa Maria Regina degli Angeli Hospital, Adria, Rovigo, Italy; 3 Unit of Urology, Santa Maria della Misericordia Academic Medical Center, Udine, Italy; 4 Department of Urology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy



BACKGROUND: To compare perioperative and functional outcomes associated with renorrhaphy performed with two different types of clips (Absolok® vs. Hem-o-Lok®) in a contemporary series of patients who underwent partial nephrectomy.
METHODS: Patients in whom Absolok® clips were used to perform haemostasis at the level of tumor bed or to block the running sutures during sliding-clip renorrhaphy (study group) were compared with a contemporary control group of patients in whom renorrhaphy was performed with Hem-o-Lok® clips. Both groups received the same surgical technique via an open or robot-assisted approach. Inner renorrhaphy was performed with one or more 3-0 (26 mm needle) monofilament running suture(s) preloaded with medium Absolok® clips in the study group, and with medium Hem-o-Lok® clips in the control group. Cortical renorrhaphy was performed using interrupted 2-0 (26 mm needle) polyfilament sutures placed at intervals of 1 cm using the sliding-clip technique with Absolok® clips in the study group and with Hem-o-Lok® clips in the control group. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were compared.
RESULTS: Absolok® clips were used in 57 patients, while Hem-o-Lok® clips were used in 40 patients. The two groups were comparable for all preoperative patient and tumor characteristics. No differences were observed in terms of operating room time (P=0.29), off-clamp technique rate (P=0.96), warm ischemia time (P=0.19) and estimated blood loss (P=0.18). No difference in the rate of positive surgical margins was detected (P=0.21). Ninety-day complications were observed in 32 (33%) cases. No difference in overall and major postoperative complications were observed between the two groups (P=0.20). Abdominal CT scan performed after 3 months following surgery showed no Absolok® clips in all cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Absolok® clips are a valid alternative to Hem-o-Lok® clips to secure blood vessels at the level of tumor bed and to perform a sliding-clip renorrhaphy in patients who underwent open or robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.


KEY WORDS: Absolok® clips; Hem-o-Lok® clips; Renorrhaphy; Sliding clip technique; Partial nephrectomy; Perioperative outcomes; Complications; Renal cell carcinoma

top of page