Home > Journals > Minerva Pneumologica > Past Issues > Minerva Pneumologica 2007 March;46(1) > Minerva Pneumologica 2007 March;46(1):39-42

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints
Permissions

 

REVIEWS   

Minerva Pneumologica 2007 March;46(1):39-42

Copyright © 2007 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: Italian

Controversial diagnostic test in allergy: traditional versus alternative medicine

Failla M., Moncada R., Mastruzzo C., Crimi N., Vancheri C.

Sezione di Malattie Respiratorie e Allergologia Dipartimento di Medicina Interna e Medicina Specialistica Università degli Studi di Catania, Catania, Italia


PDF


Allergic diseases represent an emerging problem because of the increasing prevalence in a consistent part of the population. Despite the understanding of physiopathological basis of allergic diseases is continuously improving, diagnostic procedures currently available are often limited to the basic skin tests and to dangerous challenges. In this context, an altered perception of allergies in the population is further amplified by the increase of somatic disorders that requires careful evaluation and punctual diagnosis. Alternative diagnostic tests are not scientifically validated procedures which are more and more used in the diagnostic workup of allergies nowadays. Cytotoxic test, provocation-neutralization tests, electrodermal testing, applied kinesiology are all examples of nonvalidated tests used in the clinical practice by physician and by clinical analysis laboratories. The purpose of this review is to critically examine alternative diagnostic procedures and their rationale, in order to inform physicians on the relative usefulness of these methods in disorders which might require much careful examination and attention.

top of page