Home > Journals > Minerva Pediatrics > Past Issues > Articles online first > Minerva Pediatrics 2021 Aug 02

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as
Share

 

 

Minerva Pediatrics 2021 Aug 02

DOI: 10.23736/S2724-5276.21.06431-4

Copyright © 2021 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Non-invasive Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) in the pediatric ICU: assessing optimal Edi compliance

Riwaaj LAMSAL 1 , Gwenyth FISCHER 1, Michael SHYNE 2, Arif SOMANI 1

1 Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA; 2 Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA


PDF


BACKGROUND: Bronchiolitis patients are supported with non-invasive conventional modalities (HFNC, CPAP and BiPAP). Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) is a newer mode which supports based on electrical activity of the diaphragm (Edi). It is unclear if non-invasive NAVA is used within optimal operational parameters. The study aim was to evaluate Edi compliance.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review of bronchiolitis patients admitted to the PICU from January 2015 to January 2018 was undertaken. NAVA compliance within optimal parameters (defined as Edi peak values between 5-15 μV and Edi min < 1μV) was assessed as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included PICU length of stay (LOS), duration to minimal respiratory support (defined as 4 L/min or less on HFNC) and intubation rate in the conventional (non-NAVA) and non-invasive NAVA.
RESULTS: Sixty-three patients with a mean age of 6.89 months with 30 on NAVA and 33 on non-NAVA support were analyzed. Compliance with optimal Edi peak and Edi min was 50.4% (±37.5%) and 33.8% (±26.2%) respectively. Regression models for PICU LOS with minimal respiratory support and for 1L/kg of HFNC showed adjusted R2= 0.96 and 0.92, respectively. The mean PICU stay for NAVA was 146.00 hrs. (±66.26) versus 69.58 hrs. (±57.69) for the non-NAVA group (p<0.001). Duration to minimal respiratory support was 125.40 hrs. (±54.90) for NAVA versus 58.03 hrs. (±58.97) for non-NAVA group (p<0.001). A higher intubation rate was found in the NAVA group (13.33% versus 3.03%, p=0.296).
CONCLUSIONS: We found suboptimal compliance with operational parameters with non-invasive NAVA support. There was longer PICU LOS, time to minimal respiratory support in the NAVA compared to the non-NAVA support.


KEY WORDS: Intensive Care Unit; Pediatric; Bronchiolitis; NAVA; Compliance

top of page