Home > Journals > Minerva Pediatrics > Past Issues > Articles online first > Minerva Pediatrica 2018 Dec 03

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Publishing options
eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as
Share

 

 

Minerva Pediatrica 2018 Dec 03

DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4946.18.05319-7

Copyright © 2018 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Pediatric total fractionated metanephrine. Age-related reference intervals in spot urine

Laura ROLI , Agnese VERONESI, Maria C. DE SANTIS, Enrica BARALDI

Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Azienda USL of Modena, Modena, Italy


PDF


BACKGROUND: Sparse metanephrines reference intervals in pediatric populations are available and different study designs and technologies/ assays used in these studies lead to hardly transferable data from a laboratory to another. The objective of the study was to update pediatric reference intervals of total fractionated metanephrines in spot urine samples, using a commercial extraction kit run on a specific high pressure liquid chromatograph coupled with an electrochemical detector.
METHODS: 452 spot pediatric urinary samples previously submitted to urinalysis were consecutively included in the study with the exclusion of children's samples with diagnosis or clinical suspicion of paraganglioma/pheochromocytoma, kidney diseases and arterial hypertension. Urinary metanephrine, normetanephrine and 3-methoxytyramine were extracted with ClinRep® HPLC Complete kit and run on HPLC Prominence liquid chromatograph LC-20AT (Shimadzu Italia S.r.l. Milan, Italy) coupled with Decade II electrochemical detector (Antec Scientific, The Nederlands, provided by Alfatech S.r.l. Geneve, Italy). Results were expressed as the ratio analyteto-creatinine.
RESULTS: Any of the three analyte required a ripartition by gender (metanephrine p=0.27; normetanephrine p= 0.90 and 3-methoxytyramine p= 0.18). A significant statistically inversely proportional relation with age was found for metanephrine (p< 0.0001; ρ= -0.72), normetanephrine (p< 0.0001; ρ= -0.75) and 3-methoxytyramine (p< 0.0001; ρ= -0.83). Reference intervals were calculated as function of age.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides pediatric reference intervals for urinary fractionated total metanephrines in spot urine calibrated on a specific instrumentation and extraction commercial kit.


KEY WORDS: Metanephrines - Urine - Pediatrics - Reference intervals - HPLC-ECD

top of page