![]() |
JOURNAL TOOLS |
Publishing options |
eTOC |
To subscribe |
Submit an article |
Recommend to your librarian |
ARTICLE TOOLS |
Publication history |
Reprints |
Permissions |
Cite this article as |
Share |


YOUR ACCOUNT
YOUR ORDERS
SHOPPING BASKET
Items: 0
Total amount: € 0,00
HOW TO ORDER
YOUR SUBSCRIPTIONS
YOUR ARTICLES
YOUR EBOOKS
COUPON
ACCESSIBILITY
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Minerva Pediatrica 2018 December;70(6):529-38
DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4946.16.04426-1
Copyright © 2015 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA
language: English
Telerehabilitation in developmental dyslexia: methods of implementation and expected results
Chiara PECINI ✉, Silvia SPOGLIANTI, Silvia MICHETTI, Silvia BONETTI, Maria C. DI LIETO, Filippo GASPERINI, Paola CRISTOFANI, Margherita BOZZA, Daniela BRIZZOLARA, Claudia CASALINI, Sara MAZZOTTI, Renata SALVADORINI, Stefania BARGAGNA, Anna M. CHILOSI
Department of Developmental Neuroscience, IRCCS Stella Maris, Pisa, Italy
BACKGROUND: Developmental Dyslexia is a disorder, highly frequent in the school population, for which the recommended rehabilitation procedures are not well defined. This study aimed to automatize reading decoding skills by using an innovative system for rehabilitation, based on a telerehabilitation method. It requires an intensive home-exercise with the supervision, by web, of the clinician. The study had three main aims: to diffuse knowledge on new methods for rehabilitation of reading difficulties; to verify whether an intensive and simplified exercise, targeted to the automation of reading, is suitable for different subgroups of dyslexic children; to define the treatment effects on basic cognitive functions underlying reading.
METHODS: Twenty-five children, grouped according to the neuropsychological and anamnestic profiles, took part to the treatment by the software Reading Trainer®.
RESULTS: Both speed and accuracy of reading decoding increased significantly after treatment, independently from the functional neuropsychological profile or the history of oral language delay. These changes were specific to decoding and not associated with improvements in reading comprehension or spelling skills. However, there was a “cascade effect” of the treatment efficacy on those basic cognitive functions considered precursors of the ability to read, with significant improvements in rapid lexical access, phonological processing and visual attention.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides information on the efficacy of new tools for telerehabilitation of specific reading disorders.
KEY WORDS: Dyslexia - Telerehabilitation - Language development disorders