Home > Journals > Minerva Pediatrica > Past Issues > Minerva Pediatrica 2018 February;70(1) > Minerva Pediatrica 2018 February;70(1):27-34

CURRENT ISSUE
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Cite this article as

MINERVA PEDIATRICA

A Journal on Pediatrics, Neonatology, Adolescent Medicine,
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry


Indexed/Abstracted in: CAB, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 0,764


eTOC

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE  


Minerva Pediatrica 2018 February;70(1):27-34

DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4946.16.04314-0

Copyright © 2015 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

A comparative study of surgical outcomes using a Colorado microdissection needle versus standard-size needle electrocautery in one-stage hypospadias repair using a transverse preputial island flap

Wei-Qiang LIANG, Yi-Hong QIU, Chen-Yang JI, Yu-Hong CHEN, Jia-Qi ZHANG, Yuan-Yuan YAO, Jin-Ming ZHANG

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China


PDF  


BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes of a Colorado microdissection needle (CMN) with that of a standard-size electrocautery needle in one-stage hypospadias repair using a transverse preputial island flap (TPIF).
METHODS: The records of patients who received hypospadias repair from September 2012 to October 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into a group that received repair using a CMN and those in which a standard-size electrocautery needle was used. Data collected and compared included age, types of hypospadias, duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative edema and complications.
RESULTS: There were 51 patients in the CMN group and 44 in the standard needle group, and the groups were similar with respect to age and type of hypospadias. The median surgery time for the CMN group was significantly shorter than that of the standard group (15.7 minutes vs. 20.6 minutes, respectively, P<0.001). At postoperative day 7 and day 30, the CMN group had significantly less patients with edema than the standard needle group (31.4% vs. 65.9%, P<0.01; and 37.3% vs. 79.5%, P<0.001, respectively). The overall complication rate has no significant difference between two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of CMN for tissue dissection and separation in hypospadias repair can facilitate foreskin degloving, shape the flap in a more efficient way, and help maintain adequate blood supply for the new urethra and its skin coverage.


KEY WORDS: Hypospadias - Urethra - Surgery, plastic

top of page

Publication History

Issue published online: January 12, 2018
Article first published online: July 8, 2015
Manuscript accepted: July 1, 2015
Manuscript revised: June 19, 2015
Manuscript received: April 1, 2015

Cite this article as

Liang WQ, Qiu YH, Ji CY, Chen YH, Zhang JQ, Yao YY, et al. A comparative study of surgical outcomes using a Colorado microdissection needle versus standard-size needle electrocautery in one-stage hypospadias repair using a transverse preputial island flap. Minerva Pediatr 2018;70:27-34. DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4946.16.04314-0

Corresponding author e-mail

40381594@qq.com