Home > Journals > Minerva Orthopedics > Past Issues > Minerva Orthopedics 2021 December;72(6) > Minerva Orthopedics 2021 December;72(6):588-94

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Publishing options
eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as
Share

 

REVIEW  CURRENT CONCEPTS IN THE TREATMENT OF ANKLE OSTEOARTHRITIS 

Minerva Orthopedics 2021 December;72(6):588-94

DOI: 10.23736/S2784-8469.21.04115-8

Copyright © 2021 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Custom-made implants in ankle bone loss: from total ankle replacement to reconstruction-arthrodesis

Massimiliano MOSCA 1, Emanuele VOCALE 1, Marco DI PONTE 1, Silvio CARAVELLI 1 , Stefano ZAFFAGNINI 1, 2

1 Second Clinic of Orthopedics and Traumatology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy; 2 Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), University of Bologna - Alma Mater Studiorum, Bologna, Italy



INTRODUCTION: In recent years the management and treatment of severe bone loss and severe deformities has improved, thanks to the advancement of available technologies. 3D printing represents the process of creating a predefined object through the precise deposition of material layer upon layer, allowing implants to be customized according to the anatomy of each patient. This work is set as a narrative review of the most recent reconstruction techniques for severe ankle deformities because of traumas, avascular necrosis, fail of former ankle prosthetic implant.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic research based on PubMed and Google Scholar databases has been performed, covering the period between 1989 and 2021. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts from all identified studies to assess their eligibility to the research question.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The process steps leading to the implantation of a custom-made prosthesis or to the execution of a custom-made arthrodesis can consist of several phases: medical imaging collection and processing, modelling, and designing, surgical intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of 3D-printed patient-specific devices allowed the execution of surgical procedures that, for anatomical reasons, would have been impossible to perform with standard implants. It still remains to be clarified, between total ankle replacement and reconstruction/arthrodesis, which allows the best long-term function.


KEY WORDS: Orthopedics; Ankle; Arthrodesis

top of page