Home > Journals > Minerva Orthopedics > Past Issues > Minerva Orthopedics 2021 December;72(6) > Minerva Orthopedics 2021 December;72(6):564-70

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Publishing options
eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as
Share

 

REVIEW  CURRENT CONCEPTS IN THE TREATMENT OF ANKLE OSTEOARTHRITIS 

Minerva Orthopedics 2021 December;72(6):564-70

DOI: 10.23736/S2784-8469.20.04071-0

Copyright © 2020 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Partial and total ankle allografts

Sandro GIANNINI 1, Antonio MAZZOTTI 2 , Alessandro PANCIERA 2

1 IRCCS Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; 2 IRCCS Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute, First Orthopedic and Traumatological Clinic, Bologna, Italy



INTRODUCTION: Osteochondral lesions of the ankle joint still represents a challenge for orthopedic surgeons. In recent years, biological treatment solutions such as osteochondral allograft transplantation have been proposed. The aim of this review article is to report about current concepts and results of partial and total allograft in the ankle joint.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: All studies published in PubMed from 2000 to September 2020 regarding partial and total ankle allografts in the ankle joint were identified, considering the following criteria: level I-IV evidence addressing the areas of interest outlined above; measures of functional, clinical, or imaging outcome; and outcome related to ankle cartilage lesions or ankle arthritis treated by allografts.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The number of selected articles was 21; 11 of those focused on partial allografts and 10 on bipolar fresh osteochondral allografts. All papers presented are case series.
CONCLUSIONS: Osteochondral allograft in the ankle joint represent a concrete option to repair major osteochondral defects. Despite the literature showed interesting findings, many controversies remain regarding the use of total ankle allograft transplantations and their superiority compared to standard techniques.


KEY WORDS: Ankle; Orthopedics; Allografts

top of page