Home > Journals > Minerva Obstetrics and Gynecology > Past Issues > Minerva Ginecologica 2007 April;59(2) > Minerva Ginecologica 2007 April;59(2):191-8

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Publishing options
eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints
Permissions
Share

 

REVIEWS   

Minerva Ginecologica 2007 April;59(2):191-8

Copyright © 2007 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: Italian

Cervical cerclage and evidence-based medicine: if, how and when

Patella A. 1, Pergolini I. 2, Custo G. 3, Rech F. 2

1 Sezione di Ginecologia e Ostetricia, Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Terapie Avanzate, Università degli Studi di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italia 2 Dipartimento di Scienze Ginecologiche Perinatologia e Puericultura, Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza, Roma, Italia 3 Clinica Ostetrica e Ginecologica, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Perugia, Italia


PDF


Cervical cerclage has always been the main treatment option in cases of so-called cervical insufficiency, a condition that is notoriously associated with a high risk of second trimester abortion and/or preterm delivery. We can distinguish between a prophylactic cerclage, to be performed electively, usually at 13-16 weeks gestation, only when the woman has a history extremely suggestive for cervical incompetence (3 or more mid-trimester abortions or preterm deliveries) and a therapeutic cerclage. This last cerclage is recommended either for women who have ultrasonographic changes consistent with a short cervix or the presence of funneling after the 16-20 weeks gestation (urgent cerclage) and for women who present the asymptomatic dilation of the uterine cervix of at least 2 cm and/or a prolapse of the amniochorial membranes (emergent cerclage). So far there is still a lack of controlled and randomized trials that can unquestionably demonstrate the advantages of the cervical cerclage in comparison with a «wait and see» aptitude. The cerclage can be performed either transvaginally, usually according to the McDonald technique, or transabdominally. This last approach is recommended when a transvaginal cerclage has to be avoided because of technical difficulties depending on the conditions of the cervix or when the pregnant woman has a history of one or more failed transvaginal cerclages. Interesting perspectives are currently offered by the laparoscopic cerclage, a method that has been effective and unexpectedly safe till now.

top of page