Home > Journals > Minerva Ginecologica > Past Issues > Articles online first > Minerva Ginecologica 2018 Feb 09

CURRENT ISSUE
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Cite this article as

MINERVA GINECOLOGICA

A Journal on Obstetrics and Gynecology


Indexed/Abstracted in: EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Emerging Sources Citation Index


eTOC

 

Minerva Ginecologica 2018 Feb 09

DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4784.18.04182-5

Copyright © 2018 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Validation of diagnostic methods for peritoneal carcinomatosis secondary to ovarian cancer. CT-scan, PET-CT or laparoscopy, what is the best?

Israel MANZANEDO 1, 5, 6 , Beatriz LOSADA 2, 6, Beatriz MARTÍNEZ-TORRES 1, 6, Fernando PEREIRA 1, 5, 6, Ángel SERRANO 1, 5, 6, Ignacio JUEZ 2, 5, 6, Estíbalitz PÉREZ-VIEJO 1, 5, 6, David GUTIÉRREZ 2, 5, Virginia PEIRÓ 3, 5, Carolina AULLÓ 4, 5

1 Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Fuenlabrada University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; 2 Department of Medical Oncology, Fuenlabrada University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; 3 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fuenlabrada University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; 4 Department of Radiology, Fuenlabrada University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; 5 Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Unit, Fuenlabrada University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; 6 Rey Juan Carlos University (URJC), Madrid, Spain


PDF  


top of page

Publication History

Article first published online: February 9, 2018
Manuscript accepted: February 1, 2018
Manuscript revised: January 29, 2018
Manuscript received: November 28, 2017

Cite this article as

Manzanedo I, Losada B, Martínez-Torres B, Pereira F, Serrano Á, Juez I et al. Validation of diagnostic methods for peritoneal carcinomatosis secondary to ovarian cancer. CT-scan, PET-CT or laparoscopy, what is the best?. Minerva Ginecol 2018 Feb 09. DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4784.18.04182-5

Corresponding author e-mail

israel.manzanedo@salud.madrid.org