Home > Journals > Minerva Ginecologica > Past Issues > Articles online first > Minerva Ginecologica 2017 Nov 21

CURRENT ISSUE
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Cite this article as

MINERVA GINECOLOGICA

A Journal on Obstetrics and Gynecology


Indexed/Abstracted in: EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Emerging Sources Citation Index


eTOC

 

Minerva Ginecologica 2017 Nov 21

DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4784.17.04177-6

Copyright © 2017 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Intrapartum care quality indicators: a literature review

Elisa LAZZARETTO 1, Antonella NESPOLI 2, Simona FUMAGALLI 3, Elisabetta COLCIAGO 4 , Sofia PEREGO 2, Anna LOCATELLI 2, 5

1 Maternity Department, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy; 2 Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy; 3 Department of Medicine and Surgery, FBBM Monza, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy; 4 Department of Health Science, Center of Biostatistics for Clinical Epidemiology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy; 5 Mother and Child Department, ASST Vimercate, Vimercate, Monza e Brianza, Italy


PDF  


BACKGROUND: Quality of care is increasingly recognized as a critical aspect of the maternal and newborn health, mainly with respect to care around labour and delivery and in the immediate postnatal period. The Aim of this Review is to identify the recommended intrapartum care indicators in order to measure the quality of Midwifery care.
METHODS: A structured literature search was conducted in August 2017 incorporating English and Italian language studies from 1993 and onwards to identify published articles on quality standards of intrapartum care. Research was performed into the area of enquiry in electronic database (Medline, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Trip) and in relevant midwifery websites.
RESULTS: We identify 369 quality indicators to measure the intrapartum care. Following a systematic process that allows to classify all indicators in domains and categories, we analysed 268 outcome and process indicators specifically designated to monitor the intrapartum care in a low risk population. Through the identification of further exclusion criteria and semantic analogies we obtained 80 final quality indicators (39 outcome indicators and 41 process indicators).
CONCLUSIONS: We identified 80 indicators that should be used to measure the quality of low risk intrapartum care. Although the majority of indicators we could monitor through hospital databases and the Italian Birth Register - CeDAP are outcome indicators, it is important to give attention also to process indicators that measure the activities performed and whether or not they are evidence-based. For a low risk population they could measure adherence with guidelines that promote and support the normality of the process.


KEY WORDS: Quality indicators - Intrapartum care - Midwifery care - Perinatal indicator - Outcome

top of page

Publication History

Article first published online: November 20, 2017
Manuscript accepted: November 13, 2017
Manuscript received: November 8, 2017

Cite this article as

Lazzaretto E, Nespoli A, Fumagalli S, Colciago E, Perego S, Locatelli A. Intrapartum care quality indicators: a literature review. Minerva Ginecol 2017 Nov 21. DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4784.17.04177-6

Corresponding author e-mail

e.colciago2@campus.unimib.it