Home > Journals > Minerva Ginecologica > Past Issues > Minerva Ginecologica 2002 December;54(6) > Minerva Ginecologica 2002 December;54(6):493-7

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
To subscribe PROMO
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints
Permissions

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLES   

Minerva Ginecologica 2002 December;54(6):493-7

Copyright © 2002 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: Italian

Postpartum perineal assessment

Pregazzi R., Sartore A., Bortoli P., Grimaldi E., Ricci G., Guaschino S.


PDF


Background. To evaluate the incidence of urogenital and anorectal dysfunctions during puerperium, verify the correlation between obstetric perineal damage observed during labour and puerperal symptoms, test the efficacy of tests to evaluate perineal function in pelvic floor dysfunctions consequent to vaginal birth.
Methods. A total of 693 consecutive puerperae were recruited two months after birth. All completed a clinical and anamnestic questionnaire and underwent clinical urogynecological examination, digital test, vaginal manometry and uroflowmetric evaluation of the voluntary capacity to interrupt micturition. From a statistical point of view, persistent urinary incontinence was identified by graphic representation on frequency tables and predictive tests, and statistical ''kappa'' was used to evaluate the correlation between perineal function tests.
Results. Stress urinary incontinence (15.1%) represents the most widespread symptom, a postpartum perineal inspection provides a sufficiently accurate estimate of posterior damage, but does not identify those puerperae who will develop urinary incontinence. None of the tests used was able to predict persistant urinary incontinence.
Conclusions. Postpartum perineal inspection seems to be effective in predicting anorectal dysfunctions, but is not so useful for urethro-vesical disorders. None of the diagnostic methods examined allowed a sufficiently accurate selection of those puerperae at risk.

top of page