Home > Journals > Minerva Endocrinology > Past Issues > Minerva Endocrinologica 1999 March;24(1) > Minerva Endocrinologica 1999 March;24(1):21-36

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Publishing options
eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints
Permissions
Share

 

REVIEWS   

Minerva Endocrinologica 1999 March;24(1):21-36

Copyright © 1999 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: Italian

Immunometric methods for the measurement of natriuretic cardiac hormones: physiological importance and clinical usefulness

Del Ry S., Andreassi M. G., Giannessi D., Clerico A.


PDF


It was well-established that the heart has an endocrine function because it is able to synthesize and secrete a family of related peptide hormones (known as cardiac peptide hormones) with potent diuretic, natriuretic and with complex interactions with the hormonal and nervous systems. Cardiac natriuretic peptides (ANP, BNP, and biologically active peptides of the N-terminal proANP1-98) are differently regulated in their production/secretion patterns and clearance rates; consequently, the assay for these peptides may provide complementary (or even different) pathophysiological and/or clinical information. The assay for cardiac natriuretic peptides has been utilized in clinical conditions associated with expanded fluid volume. In particular, this assay can be useful in discriminating between normal subjects and patients in different stages of heart failure and can also be considered as a prognostic indicator of long-term survival in patients with heart failure and/or after acute myocardial infarction. Non-competitive immunometric assays (such as two-site IRMAs), even if more expensive, seem to be preferable to RIAs for routinary assay of cardiac peptide hormones because they generally have a better degree of sensitivity, accuracy, and precision. The technical characteristics and the potential clinical usefulness of some of the methods for measuring these peptides are reviewed.

top of page