Home > Journals > Minerva Chirurgica > Past Issues > Minerva Chirurgica 2018 February;73(1) > Minerva Chirurgica 2018 February;73(1):121-3

CURRENT ISSUE
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Cite this article as

MINERVA CHIRURGICA

A Journal on Surgery


Indexed/Abstracted in: EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 1,115


eTOC

 

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR  


Minerva Chirurgica 2018 February;73(1):121-3

DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4733.17.07482-X

Copyright © 2017 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Clinical outcomes of two techniques in repairing rotator cuff tear: traditional double row vs. suture bridge

Qingbai LIU 1, Jingyu ZHANG 2, Changming XU 1, Lei JIANG 1, Wenchao JIANG 3

1 Department of Orthopedics, Lianshui People’s Hospital, Huai’an, China; 2 Jiangpu District Health Center of Huai’an, Huai’an, China; 3 Department of Orthopedics, Wujin People’s Hospital, Changzhou, China


PDF  


top of page

Publication History

Issue published online: January 30, 2018
Article first published online: September 12, 2017
Manuscript accepted: August 29, 2017
Manuscript received: August 1, 2017

Cite this article as

Liu Q, Zhang J, Xu C, Jiang L, Jiang W. Clinical outcomes of two techniques in repairing rotator cuff tear: traditional double row vs. suture bridge. Minerva Chir 2018;73:121-3. DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4733.17.07482-X

Corresponding author e-mail

245585646@qq.com