Home > Journals > Minerva Chirurgica > Past Issues > Minerva Chirurgica 2018 February;73(1) > Minerva Chirurgica 2018 February;73(1):13-9

CURRENT ISSUE
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Cite this article as

MINERVA CHIRURGICA

A Journal on Surgery


Indexed/Abstracted in: EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 1,115


eTOC

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE  


Minerva Chirurgica 2018 February;73(1):13-9

DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4733.17.07392-8

Copyright © 2017 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Preoperative staging of rectal cancer using magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with pathological staging

Riccardo FALETTI 1, Marco GATTI 1 , Alberto AREZZO 2, Silvia STOLA 1, Maria C. BENEDINI 1, Laura BERGAMASCO 3, Mario MORINO 2, Paolo FONIO 1

1 Department of Surgical Sciences, Radiology Institute, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; 2 Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; 3 University of Turin, Turin, Italy


PDF  


BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) in loco-regional staging of rectal cancer by comparing the MR results with histologic findings, considered as standard reference.
METHODS: Between July 2013 and March 2015, fifty-two patients, 27 (51.9%) males, age 66.75±13.77 years, with rectal cancer, were staged preoperatively with MR and proceeding straight to surgery. Two observers with experience in abdominal MR independently reviewed the images. T stage and N stage were evaluated according to the 7th edition of TNM classification. The estimate of Ln probability of malignancy (low, moderate, high) was based on nodal size, border contour and signal intensity and comparison between ADC value of the Ln’s belonging to the three different classifications were performed. Statistical testing included Cohen’s kappa coefficient, Mann-Whitney’s, Kruskal-Wallis, χ2, Fisher’s Exact Test and Receiving Operating Characteristics curve.
RESULTS: MR correctly assessed T stage in 47/52 cases (90.4%; kw=0.89±0.06), with inter-operator concordance of k=0.81±0.08. For Ln staging, concordance between estimate of high probability malignancy and pathology was kw=0.62±0.11. ADC was significantly different for the three grades of estimated malignancy probability (P=0.0003), decreasing from 1.227±0.298×10-3 mm2/s (low) to 1.120±0.306×10-3 mm2/s (moderate) and finally to 0.818±0.168×10-3 mm2/s (high). The ROC curve procedure established the good ability of ADC to discriminate high malignancy Ln’s (AUC=0.88) with cut-off at <1×10-3 mm2/s. The percentage of high malignancy Ln’s in the lateral pelvic space was higher than in other sites (55.6% vs. 17.6%, P=0.0003).
CONCLUSIONS: MR is an accurate imaging method in T staging and N staging of rectal cancer: prediction of N was improved by considering dimension, morphology and signal characteristic and the ability of ADC to identify high probability malignant nodes underlines its importance in the diagnostic process.


KEY WORDS: Rectal neoplasms - Lymph nodes - Neoplasm staging - Magnetic resonance imaging - Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging

top of page

Publication History

Issue published online: January 30, 2018
Article first published online: May 11, 2017
Manuscript accepted: May 8, 2017
Manuscript received: April 21, 2017

Cite this article as

Faletti R, Gatti M, Arezzo A, Stola S, Benedini MC, Bergamasco L, et al. Preoperative staging of rectal cancer using magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with pathological staging. Minerva Chir 2018;73:13-9. DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4733.17.07392-8

Corresponding author e-mail

marcogatti17@gmail.com