Home > Journals > Minerva Cardiology and Angiology > Past Issues > Minerva Cardioangiologica 2014 February;62(1) > Minerva Cardioangiologica 2014 February;62(1):83-97

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Publishing options
eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints
Permissions
Share

 

REVIEWS   

Minerva Cardioangiologica 2014 February;62(1):83-97

Copyright © 2014 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

PFO closure: rational, procedure and devices

Reiter R. 1, Bertog S. C. 2, 3, Vaskelyte L. 2, Franke J. 2, Lam S. 2, Gafoor S. 2, Hofmann I. 2, Hornung M. 2, Sievert H. 2

1 The University of Minnesota Medical School Minneapolis, MN, USA; 2 Cardiovascular Center Frankfurt Frankfurt, Germany; 3 Veterans Affairs Medical Center Minneapolis, MN, USA


PDF


Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a common anatomical variant occurring in 20-25% of the population. In most cases, a PFO remains asymptomatic. However it allows for any venous particle such as thrombus, air or vasoactive substances to bypass the lung and enter the arterial circulation. Accordingly, PFO’s have been linked to cryptogenic stroke, migraine and decompression illness. While the number of device closures have been increasing the therapy remains controversial as ‑ until recently ‑ data supporting PFO closure came from non randomized studies only. In this review we will discuss the existing data on PFO closure including results of the three randomized controlled trials comparing device closure with medical therapy in patients with cryptogenic stroke. We will also focus on the implantation technique, the complications and the different devices that are used for this procedure.

top of page