Home > Journals > Minerva Biotechnology and Biomolecular Research > Past Issues > Minerva Biotecnologica 2015 December;27(4) > Minerva Biotecnologica 2015 December;27(4):215-7

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as
Share

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLES   

Minerva Biotecnologica 2015 December;27(4):215-7

Copyright © 2015 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Importance of various combined testing methods for red urine, white blood cells analysis

Huang B. 1, Tian L. 1, Zou H. 2, Fang D. 1

1 Department of Clinical Laboratory, Xuzhou Children’s Hospital, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China; 2 Department of General Surgery, Xuzhou Children’s Hospital, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China


PDF


AIM: The aim of this paper was to explore the importance of combined using of dry chemical method, dreg analyzer, and anti-BMA urine dreg to red cells and white cells testing in urine.
METHODS: As for the urine samples of 600 patients, they were tested with urine dreg analysis, dry chemical analysis, and microscope microscopic analysis and the results were compared.
RESULTS: The positive proportion of the testing results of dry chemical analysis, manual urine dreg cystourethroscopy method, urine dreg analysis, white blood cells (WBCs) tested positive were 25.2%, 31.2%, and 33.5%, while that of red blood cells (RBCs) were 43.2%, 33.0%, and 35.2%. The difference between dry chemical method and two kinds of sediment cytourethroscopy method had statistical significance (P<0.01), and the difference between two kinds of sediment cystourethroscopy method did not have statistical significance (P<0.05).
CONCLUSION: The joint application of urine dreg analyzer, dry chemical method, and microscopy microscopic contributes to improve the detection accuracy.

top of page